A word from our sponsors...
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? I thought about this after the stray thread, and I was thinking about how much better that'd be on the dog. I don't know. Opinions please?
Thats just plain disgusting. A dog is not a sex toy. Not a toy, period. Anyone doing that should be ashamed of them selves. LadyR
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Ashamed of yourself, that's putting it mildly Lady R., that would not only be traumatic for the animal but crosses too many moral boundries to mention. If you are really looking for an animal to 'do what you will', consider giving the animal a good home. Then you can not only 'do what you will' when your wanting (and the animal is willing), but you are also giving an animal a good home and life. Just my thoughts.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I agree with LadtR and JZ. Even if fyou were willing to do such a thing, the shelters in my area wouldn't let you more than once. You can't walk in and take home a dog. There is a fee and application, they check references and also with your vet. Lastly, all the animals must be spayed or neutered. Shelter dogs can make great companions and family members, they just need a chance and someone to love. Don't go if your intent is to bring it back or just use it as a toy.
Sorry but thats disgusting, any animal is for life, and to be cared for and loved.Unless circumstances depict otherwise, like you can no longer keep it due to insecurity or ill health.Your post has made me very very angry
Im thinking of a word and it rhymes with Roll.After reading your opening comment that has a definate " i feel" statement it kinda finishes on an "oh but i dont know" to excuse itself from being your actual oppinion. (which means that your original "i feel" is not what you feel at all but is quite possably calculated to provoke) oh and the smiley face.. nice touch, after all a smile at the end means your innocent and sweet right? Normally i dont say this kinda stuff about a post but Geeze i refuse to believe that your statement is an honnestly held oppinion.
Well, I have thought of it, and I guess you could say I did it sort of, I adopted a dog from a shelter, gave him a good home for 3 years, then had to give him back due to my new living situation, I guess that makes me the devil himself in some peoples eyes, huh....or is there some time limit before you are considered "disgusting"? It is quite a hassle to adopt though, there is a waiting period while the dog is fixed and vaccinated, they DO NOT check your references and vet, at least not in my area. Dont be ashamed of yourselfNazz, it was a valid question, and some of the replies to your question here boarder on flaming....which is against board rules last time I looked.Be nice people.-Oldk9luvr Heres the rules Please read them and abide by them.... and this will be a better place for ALL of us.2.7.Your behavior towards other membersWe have rules for two circumstances:-Behavior when you download something-General behavior on our boards2.7.1. Your behavior when you download somethingA. Show respect for other peoples work: 2.7.2. General behavior on our boards D. Be polite, be kind. Don't insult anyone, be rude or vulgar and limit your complaints to constructive criticism. If you're upset about something another member has said or done, send a PM to one of the moderators explaining the problem and let them handle it instead of fanning the flames.E. Try to help other members. People visit our boards for a variety of reasons. To upload, to download, to meet friends, share feelings, ask questions, seek confirmations. We are much more than just another adult site; we are a community. We want people to be friends, and help out. Join it; it will be appreciated.M. There are usually arguments on the boards, debate them. But stay clear of anything turning ugly.
Think twice before you do it. Remember, when you take the dog from pound and bring him/her to your house, the animal thinks it has found a new home, what would it feel if was taken back to dirty, unpleasant shelter? I think it would be the biggest cruelty to his psychic.Yet on the other hand I'm almost sure that even if you did so (I really discourage) after max. two days with dog you wouldn't even think about taking it back. The same thing was with us, when I was 10 (in 1997) we was to adopt homeless "nice little poodle" but when he was brought home, it turned out he was big black crossing between poodle and some australian shepherd dog! My mom even thought a bit about taking him back, but he looked such a happy being again with humans... So he stayed and until he died in 2003 (rest in peace, Blackie, sniff sniff) he'd been the most wonderful friend our family could have. So if you want to take dog from pound, make sure it's one way ticket, after all you're taking a friend, not a new furniture.
I am willing to give you the benifit of the doubt ONLY BECAUSE YOU POSTED THIS TOPIC AS A QUESTIONin my mind the animals that are in shelters are "on death row" and to give them a false sense of security by rescuing them only to take them back after you have "had your way" is thoughtless -if not cruel -maybe you didn't think of it this way?? one can only hope...I am struggling with the whole thread of doing strays -it is the only topic I have hallmarked -I see both sides of the coin, and being in a situation where I can not have a pet of my own at this time -and the UNDERSTANDABLE general consensus that pet owners don't like to share and that it is highly unlikely -it is very very difficult to be in my shoes at the moment... sometimes even painful -so I continue to lurk and ask and investigate -I suggest you do the same -you obviously need to -BUT THINK before posting -you have unnecesarily pulled at the heart strings of a lot of good people... again, I hope it is because of thoughlessness and not selfishness...
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 8 2005, 08:35 AM) Thats just plain disgusting. A dog is not a sex toy. Not a toy, period. Anyone doing that should be ashamed of them selves. LadyR could not have said that better myself!
Yeah oldk9"luvr"...ANYONE that takes a dog out of a pound for the sole purpose to have sex with it and returns it when satisified, is a devil in my eyes; completely without empathy; completely with out regard for animals and their well beeing; HUGE egoists, in fact. What if the dog starts showing "unwanted behaviour" because of its sex toy visit at someones house; like trying to mount anything he meets? You think it will be easy finding a home for it? Or perhaps he is just put down? Seemingly that doesnt matter that much to "some"...... Its plain disgusting. No wonder the outside world regards us as monsters LadyR
Appauling! It's surprising how many people seem to spend their time devising ways to quickly gain access to an animal for their own enjoyment and not care about the animal or what happens afterwards.
hahahaha, i'm just laughing at what you guys are saying, your thinking that it is sick and "morally wrong" to take a dog from a random shelter and have sex with it? i think you guys need to think outside the box more. How morally wrong is it to have sex with an animal period you sick freaks.
QUOTE (oldk9luvr @ Mar 8 2005, 04:09 PM) Well, I have thought of it, and I guess you could say I did it sort of, I adopted a dog from a shelter, gave him a good home for 3 years, then had to give him back due to my new living situation, I guess that makes me the devil himself in some peoples eyes, huh....or is there some time limit before you are considered "disgusting"? It is quite a hassle to adopt though, there is a waiting period while the dog is fixed and vaccinated, they DO NOT check your references and vet, at least not in my area. Dont be ashamed of yourselfNazz, it was a valid question, and some of the replies to your question here boarder on flaming....which is against board rules last time I looked.Be nice people.-Oldk9luvr Heres the rules Please read them and abide by them.... and this will be a better place for ALL of us.2.7.Your behavior towards other membersWe have rules for two circumstances:-Behavior when you download something-General behavior on our boards2.7.1. Your behavior when you download somethingA. Show respect for other peoples work: 2.7.2. General behavior on our boards D. Be polite, be kind. Don't insult anyone, be rude or vulgar and limit your complaints to constructive criticism. If you're upset about something another member has said or done, send a PM to one of the moderators explaining the problem and let them handle it instead of fanning the flames.E. Try to help other members. People visit our boards for a variety of reasons. To upload, to download, to meet friends, share feelings, ask questions, seek confirmations. We are much more than just another adult site; we are a community. We want people to be friends, and help out. Join it; it will be appreciated.M. There are usually arguments on the boards, debate them. But stay clear of anything turning ugly. I've refrained from answering this thread up till now. I think there is a big difference from your situation, vs. what the original poster is mentioning are two different things. From what I garner, you adopted your dog with the intent of giving it a permanent home. Events that happened to you three years later forced you to give up your dog.I must agree with the others that picking one up from the pound, just for the sake of having fun, and then dumping it back on the pound when you are done is wrong. Any dog that I bring home gets a lifetime home, and yes, that includes strays.
QUOTE (Apoo @ Mar 8 2005, 09:17 PM) hahahaha, i'm just laughing at what you guys are saying, your thinking that it is sick and "morally wrong" to take a dog from a random shelter and have sex with it? i think you guys need to think outside the box more. How morally wrong is it to have sex with an animal period you sick freaks. Goodby Apoo. You've been flagged for the mods.......
Dont get me wrong oldk9luver, there IS a VAST difference between what happened to you and what the original question implies.The first question to me at least seems to say (in almost the same words too) "isnt it better for the animal if you just pick it up from the pound, shag it and then return it" this then implies that either 1) you cant give it a good home, 2) that being on death row is better than being intimate with people for an animal, 3)the writer is being sarcastic.Take your pick of motivations and you can see why i wasnt happy at all.What happened to you is regrettable but not the same, because it was not a cold and calculated plan to do so, i bet you loved that animal and returning it to the pound would have broke your heart.. if it wasnt for my family the mini on my avatar would have been sold to someone else and god only knows where she'd be today , im still trying to get the funds together for land to get her back, so i do know and fully realise what does happen and how it feels. i live with the pain everyday.
just my point of view, but to take something from the pound, it would be with the intentions of giving it a home, if that cant be provided then leave it where it is, the day you have at your place enjoying it, may be the day that the only person willing to give it the home shows up, and you deprived it of the chance.there is better ways of getting what you want
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
wOW, oLDK9LUVR GOT BANNED because he was standing up for the rules which ladyrott violated, I could not believe it when he emailed me this thread. I guess there are some animals more equal than others.Guess I'll be banned nowRULES DON'T MATTERD. Be polite, be kind. Don't insult anyone, be rude or vulgar and limit your complaints to constructive criticism.
Like you did in the pm to me? Followed the rules?"I'm fairly new here, and I really hate the way you treat the members here, I've given you a zero rating, I also emailed beaker suggesting he dump you. why don't you get a fucking life bitch.P.S. - WE ALL KNOW THAT AVATAR IS A FUCKING FAKE"Perhaps you shold read up?
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
That was a PERSONAL MESSAGE ladyR do you understand english? PERSONAL message, show some respect for a change
Hum...respect. Didnt think THAT word was in your vocabulary at all
I respect the rules unlike you, get a new job ladyr, you are a burnt out old FAKE, I bet you never even had sex with a dog once.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
And there "it" goes again; talking bout fakes....Now; I wonder.....
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Wow, I'm still not banned? Tell me why Oldk9luvr was banned, that is what this is all about, he called you to task for violating a rule, he did not violate half as many rules as you have in the past ten minnutes, ANSWER ME THAT!YOU WERE WRONG, ADMIT IT.And you are fat.
You are way too late, hon;) I already posted this on the thread where you have your adorable little fits LadyR
marymonusa, you really need to take a step back and look at this whole situation again. The mods of this website have a tough time with people like you. Your language is a violation of the board rules for a start, I'm surprised you're not banned to be honest. And it really is none of your business why someone else was banned. Anything could have happened between oldk9lover and the mods outside this thread. If you don't know the whole story, mind your own business.I can't stand people not appreciating what they've got, and what we've got is a group of mods who care about this forum so much they dedicate hours of their own time to keeping it in working order.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
hmmm although "personal message" means to some "off the reccord" , in this case i believe it simply means a message deliverd directly to a specific person... it does not mean that the content is outside the rules, or that the rules only apply to publicly visable postings, and especially on a board backed up by a company expect all posts to a moderator (unless your their friend) to be treated in a professional and not personal manner.In addition Marymonusa , are you positive it was THIS post he was banned for ? You are his friend yes, and you are angry & passionate yes, but being rude and disrespectful and difficult to talk to will not encourage anyone to listen to you seriously or productively.(maybe not what you wish to hear but good advice all the same)
I must have missed the post where oldk9 flew off the handle and got banned. Unless there's a deleted post that I'm missing, he was rightfully calling LadyR to task for a possible violation of the ethics guidelines which she's supposed to be enforcing. Just because you're a mod doesn't mean you can "do no wrong" -- far fromt it. If he was banned for some other reason not apparent on this thread then I apologize and will butt out of that particular discussion.The bigger picture...It's funny how people will do whatever necessary to feel good about themselves. The inmates in prison say "sure, I killed someone, but I never molested any kids!!" and beat up on the child molesters. The child molesters, possibly, say "sure I hurt a bunch of children, but I never screwed a dog!" So those of us who screw dogs (call it what it is, it's not a love affair, it's sex) -- I guess we have to find people to be "better than" too, so it seems like some of us have decided that unless you are lucky enough to be able to take a dog in and care for it for 10+ years and give it a permanent home, you're evil. If you're mature and honest enough to admit that you can't give a dog the best home, but you still want to give it (and yourself) a few hours of pleasure with NO HARM or COERCION being the RESULT of your actions-- well, apparently you're evil.Despite the fact that you're not making the dog's situation any worse than it was. Despite the fact that you're not abusing the animal or forcing it to do anything it doesn't want to do (if you are, then I retract this defense, and you're despicable). Despite the fact that what you did was completely consensual, and possibly the only sex the poor pooch will EVER have before getting his nuts manditorily snipped off or worse -- before he gets euthanized. Sounds more like you're doing it a favor to me.But yet, those who aren't in deep, "loving" relationships with their animals are scorned and held up for ridicule, whereas those of us who are fortunate enough to live in large houses with large yards and enough free time to take care of an animal -- *fortunate* enough -- are preening ourselves on what righteous folk we are.One poster even told me that it was okay to leave a dog home alone for 9+ hours a day -- but god forbid you just have sex with a stray (despite the fact that the time you were taking care of, and, yes, having sex with, the stray would probably be LIGHT years better than his time on the streets). I think they were well meaning, but I think that that's so completely wrongheaded. It's just keeping up the ILLUSION that you're in some sort of bizarre "committed" "loving" relationship with your dog, even if that illusion is only as thick as a layer of whitewash. It's like staying in the marriage "just for the kids" -- you're never doing anyone any favors by lying, even when the truth is socially unacceptable. The lying is to make US feel better about what we're doing, not to make the situation any more morally palatable. It's rationalization.Yes, I know that a lot of this is just people's opinions -- heck, this whole post is just mine. As far as the law is concerned, for 90% of us (or is it 100% of the United States by now?) what we're doing is WRONG whether it's in some sort of "committed" "loving" relationship or just a dog from the streets or the pound. So it all comes down to opinion.But my opinion is this: I firmly believe that as long as you are not HARMING an animal by your actions, and as long as what takes place between you and that animal is COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL -- it's nobody else's bloody business what you do. Stick by those rules -- no harm, and obtain consent from all INVOLVED parties -- and you can just ignore the moralizers. They'll always try to tell you who you can and can't sleep with -- apparently that's no different here than in the "straight" world. If you follow your OWN conscience, you'll know what's right and what's wrong.---------To answer the original question: I don't think you can do this because every pound I've seen requires neutering before they'll release an animal to you. Yes, I've checked. In addition, many/most of them charge hefty fees (called "donations" -- heh, gotta love non-profits) to adopt an animal -- sometimes upwards of 200 dollars. That could get pricey quickly. So no, I don't think that this tactic would work or be a good idea.
QUOTE (atomx @ Mar 10 2005, 08:31 AM) I must have missed the post where oldk9 flew off the handle and got banned. Unless there's a deleted post that I'm missing, he was rightfully calling LadyR to task for a possible violation of the ethics guidelines which she's supposed to be enforcing. Just because you're a mod doesn't mean you can "do no wrong" -- far fromt it. If he was banned for some other reason not apparent on this thread then I apologize and will butt out of that particular discussion.The bigger picture...It's funny how people will do whatever necessary to feel good about themselves. The inmates in prison say "sure, I killed someone, but I never molested any kids!!" and beat up on the child molesters. The child molesters, possibly, say "sure I hurt a bunch of children, but I never screwed a dog!" So those of us who screw dogs (call it what it is, it's not a love affair, it's sex) -- I guess we have to find people to be "better than" too, so it seems like some of us have decided that unless you are lucky enough to be able to take a dog in and care for it for 10+ years and give it a permanent home, you're evil. If you're mature and honest enough to admit that you can't give a dog the best home, but you still want to give it (and yourself) a few hours of pleasure with NO HARM or COERCION being the RESULT of your actions-- well, apparently you're evil.Despite the fact that you're not making the dog's situation any worse than it was. Despite the fact that you're not abusing the animal or forcing it to do anything than it was. Despite the fact that what you did was completely consensual, and possibly the only sex the poor pooch will EVER have before getting his nuts manditorily snipped off or worse -- before he gets euthanized. Sounds more like you're doing it a favor to me.But again, I think that the "I've gotta have SOMEONE to look down on..." syndrome applies here, too, so that those who aren't in deep, "loving" relationships with their animals are scorned and held up for ridicule, whereas those of us who aren't fortunate enough to live in large houses with large yards are basically told that we have no choice, no options.One poster even told me that it was okay to leave a dog home alone for 9+ hours a day -- but god forbid you just have sex with a stray (despite the fact that the time you were taking care of, and, yes, having sex with, the stray would probably be LIGHT years better than his time on the streets). If that isn't a perfect example of the twisted moralizing that some people around here do, I don't know what is -- as long as you can keep up the ILLUSION that you're in some sort of bizarre "committed" "loving" relationship with your dog, it's all okay (even if that illusion is only as thick as a layer of whitewash).Yes, I know that a lot of this is opinion. As far as the law is concerned, for 90% of us (or is it 100% of the United States by now?) what we're doing is WRONG whether it's in some sort of "committed" "loving" relationship or just a dog from the streets or the pound. So it all comes down to opinion -- you can all believe what you want about what you "should" do. But I firmly believe that as long as you are not HARMING an animal by your actions, and as long as what takes place between you and that animal is COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL -- it's nobody else's bloody business what you do. Stick by those rules -- no harm, and obtain consent from all INVOLVED parties -- and you can just ignore the moralizers. They'll always try to tell you who you can and can't sleep with -- apparently that's no different here than in the "straight" world. If you follow your OWN conscience, you'll know what's right and what's wrong.---------To answer the original question: I don't think you can do this because every pound I've seen requires neutering before they'll release an animal to you. Yes, I've checked. In addition, many/most of them charge hefty fees (called "donations" -- heh, gotta love non-profits) to adopt an animal -- sometimes upwards of 200 dollars. That could get pricey quickly. So no, I don't think that this tactic would work or be a good idea. Apology accepted. You dont know the entire story; so; yeah butting out would be a good idea The question asked was: Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? Apparently that got lost completely in this discussion. I replied to that question; from what I think and I feel about it. Ok; so its sex; but if whoever treat sexual partners (human or animals) as they would a dildo, I can not muster any respect for ; not that it means much to you; however; I chose to respect or not respect whom ever I want; last I checked - thats fully allowed LadyR
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 10 2005, 09:06 AM) The question asked was: Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? Yes,I suppose there are some people who do this.But one surely has no heart by chosing this way of getting "cheap sex".Just take a look at the dogs in shelters..Who on Earth could exploit those poor beings?Especially the older ones who have WAY LESS a chance to ever get out of there??I can't believe someone can get turned on by "browsing" shelters..
QUOTE (BitchFool @ Mar 10 2005, 12:42 PM) QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 10 2005, 09:06 AM) The question asked was: Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? Yes,I suppose there are some people who do this.But one surely has no heart by chosing this way of getting "cheap sex".Just take a look at the dogs in shelters..Who on Earth could exploit those poor beings?Especially the older ones who have WAY LESS a chance to ever get out of there??I can't believe someone can get turned on by "browsing" shelters.. Amen.LadyR
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Regarding the original question:I would never do it. If I were to get a dog from the pound, I'd take care of him/her for the rest of his/her life. I would never get a dog or any animal purely for sex. Also, especially in areas where shelters are very crowded, there is a chance that a few weeks after returning the animal he/she is put down. I feel that if you take an animal from the pound, you're supposed to care and look after the animal. Animals are not objects.
I think anyone who would preform such an appauling act should have indescribably bad things happen to them. Returning the dog to the pound is aweful. I know i have worked there (home life and profesion very seperate).I hate with passion anyone who could do this. if you get the dog form the pound, it's yours to take care of, not molest and send back like damaged property after a test drive. As for the dog, it gets traumatised. It is taken from a potental death sentence, thrust into a new enviroment, and with no knowlege why, sent back to D block waiting for a date with the cherry juce. And thats without the ravaging from some horney human.
QUOTE (Kitsuinari @ Mar 11 2005, 12:25 AM) I think anyone who would preform such an appauling act should have indescribably bad things happen to them. Returning the dog to the pound is aweful. I know i have worked there (home life and profesion very seperate).I hate with passion anyone who could do this. if you get the dog form the pound, it's yours to take care of, not molest and send back like damaged property after a test drive. As for the dog, it gets traumatised. It is taken from a potental death sentence, thrust into a new enviroment, and with no knowlege why, sent back to D block waiting for a date with the cherry juce. And thats without the ravaging from some horney human. Howdy Kitsuinari,Your words have summed this subject up quite admirably."Hate" is a strong word, but it pails into insignificance when compared to the actions of one who would betray the trust of an innocent soul.I have worked with many animals, some wild and others domesticated.In their eyes, I have seen fear, love and, sadly - hatred.The latter cases have always been more difficult to help, but I have always been able to make a difference in the lives of these abused and betrayed souls.To hear the mournful cry of the Dogs at the pound, is to have your heart torn from your chest.Their lonliness and pain will surely impart sorrow to the souls of those who know the true meaning of love.An animal is for life, not just for convenience.All power to those of us who share our lives with our animal brethren.To love them, and give them a happy home, is to take a look upon heaven.May all animals know happiness, forever.Poneze, totally blown away by the sheer beauty of his beloved cuddle crew.
atomx, you are completly right, i know here in australia, all dogs male and female get neutered before going to a home, and yes they ask for a small donation of at least 100 just for the bottom of the line mongrel as they saystill even if they wernt desexed i would never condone talking them from a pound for only pleasure, the biggest thing would be taking it back where you know i will probably die in two weeks.i will admit, I DONT LOVE MY DOGhe lives in the back yard, he gets feed and water, i play ball with him when i have timeand he gets his rocks off when all agree, that dosnt mean i love himhe is my mate and we enjoy each others company, i am just another member of his pack, although im the alpha, if i wasnt id be in trouble as he is near as big as me, and alot stronger, and that is the relationship we holdand to tell you the truth, its probably alot better than the two marriages that i have had
QUOTE (MarcusBrutas @ Mar 15 2005, 12:25 PM) i will admit, I DONT LOVE MY DOG But do you respect him? Thats what's the point here; the respect for a living creature. Or do you regard him as you would a toy; a car; or even a bike? When its broken, toss it away; or when its not interesting to play with anymore, toss it away. Cause THAT was what the original poster came off as; someone that dont regard animals as anything else but disposable "things". (As for your marriages..........Well; you reap what you sow )LadyR
as for respect, he is my mate, you dont have a mate you dont respect\as for marrige, people change, but i got 5 great kids from it
As for those replies; I rest my case
The answer is yes they probably do, but why i don't pretend to know, in my opinion as with many others im sure, it is utterly disgusting and morally wrong, if they want a sex toy the should buy a dildo.......
Very tough thread I consider it moraly wrong personaly,as an owner my animals are as much my loved ones as my wife and or kids. This is speaking of course as a family man and a long time zoo(keeping them seperate). It seems the topic starter my have interests for something he/she wants to explore but is not sure if its right for them.Consider it an honor to make love to an animal not just an act.
Wow. I haven't been able to view my thread in a while, but the general consensus is that I'm a disgusting, deprived f**k for asking a question. I am truly shocked that the same people that are living in fear of being judged because of their sexuality are going around judging other people. When you start replies right off the bat shouting down someone, I don't think it would encourage other people to post their opinions. It was a question but I guess questions are shunned around here. Pretty disappointed.
QUOTE (TheNazz @ Mar 25 2005, 09:18 AM) Wow. I haven't been able to view my thread in a while, but the general consensus is that I'm a disgusting, deprived f**k for asking a question. I am truly shocked that the same people that are living in fear of being judged because of their sexuality are going around judging other people. When you start replies right off the bat shouting down someone, I don't think it would encourage other people to post their opinions. It was a question but I guess questions are shunned around here. Pretty disappointed. You asked for opinions; you got them. If you didnt want them...well; dont bloody ask the question.Secondly; dont EVER even think about making this a zoophilia issue; your question was not on whether or not having sex with animals is wrong or right; your question was if it was ok to take a dog from a pound, have sex with it and send it back like a broken toy. If you dont see the difference here, I think you really need to reconsider your membership here. And while you are at it; mind your language. Perhaps a little read of the rules are in order.LadyR
Well said LadyRnow my 2 cents My wife and LOVE our dog, though neither of us have sex with him. We raised him from a puppy, because some heartless bastard threw his mother out in our neighborhood the very same day she delivered 6 puppies, we found homes for her and his 5 siblings. Opinions were asked for, and here is my own: To take an animal from a shelter, just to have sex with it and return it borders on r@pe, do you not think about the fact that yes, the animal may enjoy it, but, ( and there is always a butt, to quote my wonderful Friend)when that animal (if lucky) is later adopted, it had learned behavior (sex with humans) that many people will not desire, in fact if he tries to continually mount his new owners, or god forbid, their children, he could very well be retrurned to the shelter, and eventually put down. YES, in my opinion it is VERY WRONG!
Amen to that, Pick and LadyR. Rescuing an animal from a shelter should be just that.....a rescue. If you're going to make a commitment like that, you must follow through with it. Most of the people I know of who are involved with this lifestyle love their pets as part of the family. Sex is a secondary issue. As it should be, in my opinion.
Suck my nadz nazz......doing shit like that is plain wrong, an animal is for life, not for a week, it's not a rental car......want a toy, buy a dildo.
In my opinion it's morally wrong to do it. I think same as people here, a dog isn't a TOY.
There are many who do this, as there are quite a few folks who treat animals or really any partner as sex objects. At its best, you have a shallow short-lived experience with the animal, at its worst you've got rape.I think it's pointless and morally wrong to take a dog from the pound, or a stray for that matter, use it for your own purposes and return it. Aside from being highly shallow and selfish, it's also potentially harmful to the animal involved imho.Try giving the animal a home for the long run, build a rewarding partnership with them, you'll find the sex much more enjoyable and long lasting. Animals are beings worthy of respect and love, not sex toys, if you want one of those, get an inflatable sheep or soemthing.TK
QUOTE (bendertiger @ Mar 26 2005, 01:14 AM) Suck my nadz nazz......doing shit like that is plain wrong, an animal is for life, not for a week, it's not a rental car......want a toy, buy a dildo. Wow. Good one! LadyR, I asked for opinions, not insults. Secondly, don't tell me what to think and what not to think.
What soooooooooooooooooooo many have tried to say and HAVE said -Well maybe put it this way : Imagine your a child in an orphanage . I "nice" couple comes in and adopts you . They take you home show you this wonderful room with all the toys you could ever want. Then they feed you the best meal you have ever eaten , including dessert of course. After this wonderful meal they play games with you , make you feel well like your wanted and loved. What could be better . Then all of a sudden they jump up and say "lets go, time to go " The look on your face just begs the question, huh?????? You all get in the car and go. Then you see that they have brought you back to the orphanage and then they leave .Here you are after such a wonderful time , wondering what you've done wrong , why they ,or anyone for that matter , can't love you ............................In other words what you asked for opinions about is just plain WRONG. Of course thats just my opinion.
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 25 2005, 11:20 AM) You asked for opinions; you got them. If you didnt want them...well; dont bloody ask the question.Secondly; dont EVER even think about making this a zoophilia issue; your question was not on whether or not having sex with animals is wrong or right; your question was if it was ok to take a dog from a pound, have sex with it and send it back like a broken toy. If you dont see the difference here, I think you really need to reconsider your membership here. And while you are at it; mind your language. Perhaps a little read of the rules are in order.LadyR just where in LadyR's post do you read an insult? the one prior by bendertiger was hostile -and you laughed it off -but your attacking LadyR for non-existant insults?forthermore she didn't tell you what to "think" -she clearly outlined the difference in your initial statement and what you were back peddling it out to be after you obviously realized how horrendous the mere sugestion was -"think" was just a word in the sentence that she used to show that you were now trying to disguise and change your initial statement...finally -where do you get off talking to a mod with all that disrespect? -ummm -if not now -then soon -so here it is in advance -bye-bye!
well have any of considered to this what the dogs feelings would be.
Yes Prill...Most of us have, as you've known had you read the entire thread.....LadyR
This is getting old. Again, we're back to the "only pet owners are ever allowed to have beastsex" thing. Again, the prevailing opinion is that if you have sex with an animal in some kind of committed, loving relationship, it's perfectly wonderful and great and perfect and hot apple pie and baseball and stars and stripes forever. The implication is that pet owners are all just crooning sweet nothings in their pet's ears, staring lovingly into their eyes, and sharing their beds with them every night (whereas we nasty non-pet-owners would probably kick a puppy and laugh).But if you just want sex -- even if you're not HURTING the animal... even if what the animal WANTS by its behavior is clearly to f*ck you senseless -- then you're immoral and nasty and perverted.That, frankly, is total and utter hypocrisy. Pet owners are not some sainted, perfect class of people, nor are non-pet-owners horrid monsters. Sex with animals is not in itself bad or harmful, or we are all perverts and monsters, just as the bigots in the world will claim. And just wanting sex with no emotional strings attached is not a crime if all parties agree to it. It may not be your cup of tea, and it's usually not mine, but it doesn't have to be -- it's frankly none of your or my business what or who someone is having sex with, as long as it's fully consensual.As to taking an animal and "using it like a toy" and returning it... That's awfully strong language. It sure makes it sound worse than "taking an animal, giving it some sexual loving that it may never have a chance to experience otherwise, and then, regretfully returning it to the same situation it was already in because you've decided you can't ethically keep it as a lifelong pet." Different words, same actions, vastly different tone. People sometimes stoop to inflammatory rhetoric like this when they are unable or unwilling to formulate a reasoned, cohesive argument against a point. I'll leave it up to the reader to decide whether that was the intent here.Some folks may have realized that attacking the question of "is it okay to take an animal home from the pound just for [consensual] sex and then return it to the pound" from the viewpoint of "it's bad because it's just for sex" is dangerous, because that calls into question all other beast-sex. In simpler terms, if it's the SEX that's so bad, then we all need to take a long, hard look at what we're doing on here. If sex with animals is bad in itself, then we're all bad people. Do we really want to prove that?If it's the "just for" part of "just for sex" that's bad, I have to ask anyone reading this -- have you never wanted to just f*ck? With your animal or a human, it doesn't matter. Have you ever just needed sex? Have you ever had a "quickie" -- with anyone? If you have, then you've done something "just for sex" too, and you're, in theory, just as depraved and sick as those horrible, horrible hypothetical people taking animals home from the pound just for sex. Of course, I'm sure that you, like me, probably realize there's nothing wrong with just wanting sex with no strings attached. Even if it's not what you want, that doesn't make it wrong, just not your choise. Yes, it would be bad if you lied or hurt your partner to get it, or forced them into it, but assuming that nobody's going to do that to the animals in question is a critical assumption I'm making here. So it's most likely not just wanting sex that's bad either. If it's okay for you and I to do, it's okay for someone else to do (as long as it's consensual, blah blah -- you know the routine).So if it's NOT the sex that's bad and it's not the "just for sex" that's bad -- if it's the taking the animal from one environment, temporarily putting them into another environment, and then returning them that's bad -- then why is this situation different from petsitting, for instance? It's the same basic situation -- taking an animal out of one home (for whatever reason) for a short time, *not harming it*, and then returning it. Why is THIS case so morally bankrupt, but dogsitters are still okay? Or is it, after all, the sex that's bad? Is it fine to do this -- dump your dog with a stranger -- when it's convenient for you (if you need to go out of town for a day or two, say), but horribly perverted to do this when the other person wants sex? I hope nobody's making that argument, given how obviously hypocritical it is.Or do we all, like the bigots in larger society, "just know" that it's wrong but can't be bothered to explain why?I am like a broken record on this topic because I refuse to accept insults like "you're a sick f*ck" as valid arguments. If I did, I would have to come to the conclusion that beastiality itself is wrong and perverted and that we're all "sick f*cks," for even entertaining the idea of sex with animals since that's what most people on the street will loudly tell you about beastiality. I don't want to come to that conclusion. Do you? If not, then maybe we're all better off using reasoned debate than a string of insults.I've been warned (by an anonymous member who'll remain anonymous) that challenging the "majority opinion" on BeastForum is a quick way to get banned. They were trying to save me from that "fate worse than death." I really hope that's not true.
your continued efforts to revert a moral ethic into an overall blanket statement for beastiality and zoos is disturbing -and very sad. very very.
QUOTE (atomx @ Apr 2 2005, 11:42 AM) So if it's NOT the sex that's bad and it's not the "just for sex" that's bad -- if it's the taking the animal from one environment, temporarily putting them into another environment, and then returning them that's bad -- then why is this situation different from petsitting, for instance? Hm..Petsitting is a completely different situation because the dog you are petsitting most likely has an owner and a happy life,while this is NOT true for dogs in the shelter.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
QUOTE (atomx @ Apr 2 2005, 11:42 AM) I've been warned (by an anonymous member who'll remain anonymous) that challenging the "majority opinion" on BeastForum is a quick way to get banned. They were trying to save me from that "fate worse than death." I really hope that's not true. btw, this wasn't a very keen inclusion on your part. It is apparent that your "anonymous" friend is mis-informed, and beware because you have been lead down a trecherous path. You are very welcome to hold an opposing view here on the forum to the "majority opinion" (otherwise you would have banned long ago), HOWEVER questioning the ACTIONS of the mods or showing disrespect, is indeed a fatal mistake, and raising the issue won't get you to far either....
Atomx,Indeed this discussion is old, very old. In fact I wonder if deja news has any remnants of it from the 90s when it came through a number of times.AtomX> Again, we're back to the "only pet owners are ever allowed to have beastsex" thing. Being an owner, or at least, Knowing the owner means that you will have all the information you need to make it a safe positive experience (even if all you want is SEX.)The idea is NOT that having sex just for pleasure is bad. It's that using an animal for that purpose without consideration for it's own health and life is bad. If you fence hop, pick up a stray or pound puppy, you can't possibly know the animal and cannot possibly know all of the consequences of such an act. Nor is it possible to fully know the animal, it's likes desires and preferences, thus making communication and therefore consent difficult.Sex with animals (bestiality) is not in and of itself morally wrong, but having sex without regard for your partner certainly can be. Add to this the issue of "pet ownership." Anyone who takes a dog into their life is taking on a set of responsibilities for that dog's physical and emotional health needs as well as the cost of food vet bills and general overall care.I myself wouldn't want someone I did not know having sex with them or jeopardizing their health and well being. I could just as well transfer that feeling to any other zoo or non-zoo dog owner.The issue of strays and pound puppies is a bit different. The act of taking them in just for sex is quite short sighted and selfish. If you cared enough for the animal to give it a few moments of pleasure, why not extend yourself a bit further. Would it change your mind if you knew it would be destroyed the very next day?Aomx> Is it fine to do this -- dump your dog with a stranger -- when it's convenient for you (if you need to go out of town for a day or two, say), but horribly perverted to do this when the other person wants sex? I hope nobody's making that argument, given how obviously hypocritical it is.There is no connection here between your hypotheticals. I always tend to find responsible people to care for my animals when I am away as any responsible "pet owner" would do. Granted, having animals does indeed limit the amount of time one can spend away from home on vacations and also how long one's work day can actually be. This is just a consideration every individual has to make when bringing a dog into their lives.Sharing my animal with another human is a completely different matter. I can only think of one person on this earth (my mate) who I would let my canine be alone with (sexually.) It's a trust issue. Until a person earns my trust I assume the worst in this department. To, as the prez of the US puts it AIR on the side of caution.TK
QUOTE (Horse with name @ Mar 8 2005, 04:27 PM) . The same thing was with us, when I was 10 (in 1997) this would make you 15 this year. Is that an age limit issue? can someone be a member of this board and be 15???
1997 is 8 years ago. If he was 10 in 1997 that makes him 18 this year. He is however one month short of 18 still. So an account suspension is in order. Thanks for pointing it out. We have 60.000 members here and of course a few will slip thru.LadyR
QUOTE (marymonusa @ Mar 9 2005, 04:46 PM)I respect the rules unlike you, get a new job ladyr, you are a burnt out old FAKE, ......And you are fat. That's not very respectfull to a moderator Why are you here Tmwtp
Are we back to LadyR bashing again? Why? Are you bitchers able to do a better job as a moderator? LadyR and I have had our problems and she has always been correct in her answers. She, Beaker and the others do a great job on this site, so back off a bit. Please, before you get banned or the mods decide to shut the site down!Mod and member bashing caused another good site to shut down. I don't want to see that here!
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I havent posted anything in this forum in quite awhile, but this post struck a chord with me in a bad way.First off, a little background,I currently have 5 dogs, GS male, GS mix female, Husky male and 2 mixed females, all of which were either rescues from the pound, abandonded dogs, or someoine i knew that had to give them up and didnt want them going to the shelter.These 5 dogs are like my kids, and thats how theyre treated, both males were neutered when i got them, and none of the females are the least bit interested in anything sexual at all. However, thats ok with me, i didnt bring them home for the purpose of sex, if they were interested, cool, but it doesnt change how i feel about them in the least.THATS the point i think most here were trying to make, if all it is is a sex thing, then get a girlfriend/boyfriend whatever, dogs, horses etc. ARE NOT objects for your pleasure, theyre thinking feeling animals and as soon as you stop treating them as such your no better than a rapeist IMO, thats why there are so many out there than condemn us as sick freaks.Thats not saying that only owners can have that kind of contact with animals, thats just saying that if thats all you want out of it, then you need to find a different place to express that opinion, cos you wont likely find many in here that will cut you half the slack that i am.As a kid i used to fencehop, didnt even bother to think about what damage i could've done to the horses, only thing that i had going in my favor was that i lived next door to them and already had a relationship and trust built up beforehand, doesnt make what i did right, but i can honestly say ive never had to force myself on anything to "get some".When i get a dog from the shelter, sex is not my first and foremost concern, ive had a couple ive had to return due to them not getting along with the kids/other dogs, but i never take it lightly and never just for sex.In the end, your going to think and do what you like, but expect to get flamed to a certain degree by those that view what your seggesting as nothing more than "picking up a hooker for the night" an unknowing one at that.Guns
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
first of all, i think that is cool to have a lot of dogs at home... such a little dog`s pack, but not in purpose to have a sex with them... u are lucky man, Gun.but, unfortunatly i have no possability to do this... i just moved, and i have no my own hove and here is a big city...
i think ive said this before, quite awhile ago i have never got a dog from the pound,but i have bought dogs (hounds)for hunting dogs they were ussually large females you might say they were dual purpose dogs i used them for hunting and had sex with them .when i buy a dog (a female )i always in the back of my mind knew what i was going to do with them i do not become emotionally attached to my animals i have some favorites .i am emotionally attached to my wife ,kids and grandkids and friends. i raise dogs and horses and they are well cared for . i cannnot say if getting an animal from the shelter to have sex with is right or wrong in the first place i do not know of any shelter that would allow you to do this most of them want money to pay for the nuetering up front
atomx, I'm proud of you for writing what you really think and not being scared of doing so, and I'm glad you kept it relatively polite. Though there are a few things that other members said, which are very important. I think pudgy's post was very good, she used a great example and I think she's right, the dog would be wondering what it did wrong and why it was going back.I think pick7 also had a very good point about the behaviour the dog would have learned and may later try and use, with new owners.As for my opinion on the whole matter.. if you are able to adopt a dog from the pound and are able to pay the fee and you're allowed dogs at the place you live, then why on earth wouldn't you keep the dog? Dogs are extremely wonderful, they're loyal and make excellent friends. I think taking one from the pound and using it for self pleasure and returning it again later is selfish.TheNazz, I'm not saying that you wanted to do this and I realise that you were just asking a question, so if anything I said offends you, please let me know so that I can edit this post. The last thing I want to do is offend anyone and from what I gathered, you seemed quite offended by what some of the other members said and I don't want you to feel bad because of anything I said.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
" Thats just plain disgusting. A dog is not a sex toy. Not a toy, period. Anyone doing that should be ashamed of them selves"Thank you. I was just about to post something very similar.What a selfish bit of disgusting wankery.
I just want to clarify.Someone earlier suggested that we all think only those who are in a commited pet relationship are allowed to have beast sex, and everyone else is evil, depraved, etc. That isn't what I am saying neccesarily. I don't think having sex with an animal that isn't yours is always wrong. But the specific situation he described is, in my opinion. Yes, that is all it is, an opinion, but that is what he asked for. I think it is a betrayal of trust and is certainly unfair to the animal.
QUOTE (TheNazz @ Mar 7 2005, 11:23 PM) Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? I thought about this after the stray thread, and I was thinking about how much better that'd be on the dog. I don't know. Opinions please? That has got to be the most coldblooded heartless thing I have ever heard:( How could anyone even think that way?
This is where Beastialists and Zoophiles always clash... The Zoophiles love their "animals" as you would a bf/ gf partner, whatever you may call it and of course, like human+human relationships, sex is part of it. Beastialists are people who see animals as a sexual release or a "toy" of some kind with no feelings or lasting emotions.... Im glad I was born a Zoo
That's a genralization Kamodragon...and a coarse one at that. I think that whether you're a zoo or a beastie...the basic RESPECT for the animal should be present; hence; neither a zoo nor a beastie should ever even consider doing what the original asks. And that has nothing to do with sex; it has to do with the fact that its heartless, respectless and down right morally wrong.LadyR
QUOTE (Kamodragon @ May 1 2005, 08:06 AM)This is where Beastialists and Zoophiles always clash... The Zoophiles love their "animals" as you would a bf/ gf partner, whatever you may call it and of course, like human+human relationships, sex is part of it. Beastialists are people who see animals as a sexual release or a "toy" of some kind with no feelings or lasting emotions.... I couldn't disagree more. Just because I (and others) have sexual and emotional feelings for humans does not mean that we don't love and care for animals just as much as our zoo counterparts... and by some of the incrediably insensitive remarks that get posted -apparently sometimes even more... love is limitless -we don't have to be confined to one or the other... like you suggested -it's genetic -your gift is no greater than ours... beasty should never be defined as some one who just likes sex with animals -it should be defined as some one who loves animals and also likes to have sex with them but are not exclusive... people who have sex with animals with disreguard for thier care and welfare are not beasty -but I will get banned if I say what they are!@#!I would also like to remind everyone that there are members on our board that are neither zoo or beasty -and have hearts of pure gold -and love animals as much or more than some who are active! as far as clashing -only when some thinks they are superior because they are exclusive -or someone makes an insensitive remark suggesting that
My apologies, It was not intended to offend. I did not mean a beastie or a zoo was exclusive with animals or not, my understanding based on some research I did in college was that a zoo was emotionallyand sexually attatched to animals and beasties were only sexually attatched... I was not reffering to anyone's heart nor to them as good or bad people.... In my mind beastialists were sex only and disregarded the intrest of the animal., thus I refer to myself as a zoo because I love the animal like I would a human....I found information about this on www.zoophilia.net Again, sorry for the miscommunication, I enjoy the forum and the people on it very much and my last intention was to clash horns....
my apologizes as well -in written communication one can only take from a conversation what the other relays... I know that the definitions for zoos and beasty seemed to be many and varied according to the source -this is a site that has little to no tolerance for those who seek to exploit animals OR people -so I thinks it safe to say that even if my definition wasn't text book -it was workable for the site for that moment -this site holds zoos beastys furries and any other members here who care about people and animals with love and reguard as equals -and isn't intrested in classifying them -and especially classifying them with a higher or lower status within the community... as you can imagine, on a site this size, far to often undesirables or those with mind sets that aren't condusive to the welfare of the forum as a whole make appearances -they are quickly weeded out -thanks for clarifying your position.
I have not read the full length of this thread mainly due to lack of time as I have to get ready fur work, but this is my honest true opinion of the question asked:I find the act and idea of just taking home fur sex and then returning him/her as terrible. They should be given a safe home that should be fur the remainder of their lives. It is possible as been said that the life-circumstances cn change and mybe being forced to move to areas where dogs can't be kept. In that case one sholud try and find another home first. You could have a section or thread in here where you could find people to take over dogs or other animals.Do people do this? I don't doubt that fur a second. ALOT of humans tend to do things fur their own good or pleasures without regard to other humans, enviroment or animals. There may not be many of them that do THIS but we are many humans with many different cultures and lifestyles so I wouldn't say Nopes, People don't do this. Svadilfari
Just a qwick relpy as busyAs some one who when very new to the borad asked a simliar respect based question. " Is it right to use leg straps with a horse" must give the first post some slack, however the question rased is simply are animals disposable sex toys or things that we love and chersih. I think i speak for the majority of peopel on this board whne i say i hope we are all animal lovers and not just users.This does bring out other points though shuch as should fence jumping be encoradge or frowned upon i no from personal experiance on my farm there are some very sick people around with a intrest in animals some 5 years ago we had to have a mare put to sleep after she was attaked by some sick horse ripper.Might have got a little of topic but maby not every one on here is into animal welfareand that is my 3 pence
Heated discussion! I find it hard to believe that anyone would have such disregard, for the well being of another life! If you take the responsibility, to have a pet, that's a life that you are completely responsible for. In the wake of the animal not being compatible with other family members, or such, then I could see finding a new and good home for the pet. But as to abuse any animal, by using them sexually, when their not comfortable, or picking one up at the pound just for this act, is a complete act of a immoral human being! Any pet should be part of the family, and if the pet wants to participate in other curricular activities, I would consider that a bonus!
c'est simplement scandaleux, un animal se respect et si on en adopte un, il faut le garder et l'aimer dabord pour se qu'il est et non comme un jouet sexuel.
Wrong just plain wrong to use a dog for sex not love.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Well said, Amour de chien.Hey pudgybitch,I saw that movie... it was called "Annie", ha!On a serious note to Nazz...personally, I would never do it and can't understand why anyonewould go through all the trouble? I mean I love women,but if I wasn’t “getting any“, I wouldn’t get sex from a hooker(no offense to people who do, of course). Plus, I could be wrong,but I would think alot of these dogs would need to be trained...it may not come as naturally as you think., unless you’re talking about female dogs.But either way I wouldn’t do it.Now, I don't know that much about dogs or how kennels work,but if what most of you are saying is trueabout f-ing up the dog’s chances of living…well then I believe it’s wrong.Although in Nazz’s defense,I believe it was a simple question that maybe didn’t need such a backlash.I mean lets face it, we’re all a little screwed up… and yes we all make mistakes.For people like me who are new to this world,we sometimes need to know, “How far, is too far?”.And then make our decisions based on the consensus… we’re just curious.That’s the reason I ask so many questions… right wyldfyre? Ha!Do I think it would f-up the dog mentally?No, the dog won't give a shit... it's an animal for Christ sake!I mean we eat animals... at least I do.Look, all animals really want to do is eat, shit, and f*ck… and they’re happy.I think people compare dog feelings too much to human feelings.I know some of you think a dog needs to be loved by us humans,but I believe they really don’t need us as much as you think.Just my opinion.BTW - Alot of my comments are tongue-in-cheek so don't take too much offense,unless someone wants to rip me a new one... I can take it, I'm a big boy, ha!Just please don’t kick me off… I love this site!!!PS - Sorry to open up this sore subject again,I realize it has been almost a year since the infamous “question” was posted.
hmmm. I must say that i do beleive that some people in the forum are saying some nasty things out of anger. thats perfectly understandable but it gets us nowere. if a man and a woman get together and have sex once and then depart is that wrong. no. but the difference with a adog is that it cant go back to a nice warm home like the man or the woman can afterwords. it is forced to go to a place where it has virtualy no rights besides the basic animal abuse laws. the dog is not free to do whatever it wants after this sesion is over. so my conclusion is that it is not right. there are other ways that you can obtain sex with an animal with no strings atached where it doesnt hurt the animal in the longrun. like petsitting for instance. i beleive it was mentioned earlier in this forum. but if you have sex with a dog your sitting without the consent of its owner of companion, is it wrong. its like having a human partner and someone is having sex with them and you dont know about it. if you found out how would you feel?all people are not the same.p.s. help break the stereotypes
omg! How traumatic that would be for the dog..
QUOTE (oldk9luvr @ Mar 8 2005, 08:09 AM) Well, I have thought of it, and I guess you could say I did it sort of, I adopted a dog from a shelter, gave him a good home for 3 years, then had to give him back due to my new living situation, I guess that makes me the devil himself in some peoples eyes, huh....or is there some time limit before you are considered "disgusting"? It is quite a hassle to adopt though, there is a waiting period while the dog is fixed and vaccinated, they DO NOT check your references and vet, at least not in my area. Dont be ashamed of yourself I had to do that once too, though not a partner for sex, when moving country. Yeah, when adopting it isn't all that easy just to give them back. I had to post an add for three months asking if anyone wanted him, and then explain why I had to get rid of him when I came back to the pound, although I didn't have to prove anything. They also required at the time I adopted him that I had him broken, but I never had the heart to do it, so when he came back I had to explain that too. They were nice, but they would ask a lot of questions, put up some limitations, and still made me pay too. On the up side, if you do have to give them back and they do think you have no choice they let you meet people looking at him and everything, and the lady even called to tell us she was sure he went to a good home when he went. It was real people doing a real service for us and our animals.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
WTF ? That's VERY VERY WRONG !!! Who would do that to a Dog ! you are evil Nazz !
QUOTE (TheNazz @ Mar 8 2005, 02:23 AM) Have any of you ever heard of getting a dog from the pound, bringing it home, doin what you will, then giving it back to the pound? I thought about this after the stray thread, and I was thinking about how much better that'd be on the dog. I don't know. Opinions please? :) I almost did someting simmilar, but it was when a hurricane was approching and I wanted to take the dog to my home to be safe, I was trying to take the intact male lab for a little fun, but that wasn't the only reason.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
umm this is very old but how could anyone do that to a dog if you ever been to the pound and have seen the way the dogs look at you it makes you want to adopt them all eveytime i go there i pet them through the cage who are they to tell me no they are the ones putting loving animals in cages now that i think of it im problably torturing them by going there just to pet them and play with them oh no now im the bad guy
wow this is a very interesting topic so much heated discussion but i think we all know what the out come to the answer to this question was...
No but thats a great idea !!!
Last modified on March 17th, 2010 | Zoodestiny.com | © 2003-2005 - All Rights Reserved