A word from our sponsors...
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I was talking with another zoo the other day and this topic came up in conversation. It was interesting enough I thought, to warrent a poll... What are your thoughts?
Seems like you think among the same lines like i do I made a similar thread some time ago >->-> Would you share your animal?Well i would say sharing is moraly wrong! Very few nonzoo people would want to share their human partner - exept those who are swingers and get the kick out of watching other people doing their love or doing other people. Im not one of those who would happyly share their partner. I dont like the idea to share my love, the being im in love with, a being i would die for, with someone else! But there are two people out there which i would allow to have sex with my mate, but only if he would be willing! Which means he has to make the invation, he has to make the first step! Hes a male dog and therefor he would probably dont care what hes screwing, but on the other hand he never made any steps or invations towards any other human. Even though he knows it brings him pleasure...As for a female dog, well its a bit different to me. I know she is able to decide (like a male too) what she wants and what not, but still i would feel bad to let a forigner (even if i would know him) do her... It would be up to her if she would want him to do her. I would never bring her into a situation where she would have to make the choice! I mean, like bring her into a room where we usualy make love or something similar. Something similar was said way before allready, on the old forum we had similar debate about doing a bitch in heat, cause she isnt able to act agains her natural instincts. I can partly agree on this, a bitch inheat would let almost ever male dog mount, and she would to the same thing with ever other male partern (a human male for example). I cant assure nor can i deny that cause i only met two bitches in heat before and both of them allowed me to "play" with them out of heat - though one only after our first sexual contact was when she was in heat.But on the other hand she is still able to say no! And many here can prove that if a dog says no it means No! They have atleast alot of good arguments! Anyways, im getting off topic... So im usualy against sharing of partners but with those two friends i would. Because i trust them, even with my life and i know that no one of them would ever hurt a animal. They both do care for their animal partners more then for theirselfs! So if my mate - let it be male or female - would make a invation towards one of them i wouldnt deny her the pleasure!
There is exactly and only one way to "share" my family. You must become part of that family. Fair warning: the entrance exam is long and tough.
Nope.. I don't share,,not with just "some person"... my husband is a different story.. couples that share in this are wonderful... we're a "family"... but to answer a request that I hear so often... "Looking for first time to be knotted, anyone in my area?"... OR "Looking to watch woman and K9"... Uhhhh...NO!! Like most other people, my sex life is kind of a private thing. (I mean sharing in here is different) But to just let some stranger in to "do the dog" or WATCH? NOPE... ain't happenin!!!
Well I voted "only with friends" (and would have added the proviso that "only if my beasties like you" as well).I've never been hung up on the idea of exclusivity in a relationship, I have had open relationships with my human partners (and have one with my current human partner too) so I don't see why my relationships with animals should be any different. Of course I'm choosy who I sleep with so I'd be choosy about who I would invite - like the poll said, cool folks only - the "Can I watch you with a dog.. drool...drool" types would not get a look in
I would have to nkow theperson first hand and be very comfortable with them. by comfortable I would have to truct them implicitly that they would not harm my lover.Gl
In my opinion, monogamy isn't really possible for zoophiles who are also in a human relationship. By definition then, the arrangement between two human partners, for me, would have to include animals. Beyond that, it goes almost without saying that even in this case, it would never happen without the consent of the animal involved and only rarely if ever, include others outside the original partnership.
i would have to say no. though it is morally wrong to me it may not be to others (ie zoophillia) on a second note there are a whole lotta diseases that can be spread by doing this. did you know that they say the aids virus can survive in a bitches vagina for upto 24 hours or is it 48? i cant remember for sure.
Yes. If me AND the animal know and trust the other person or persons, I would share. But, if I think there is any chance that the other person could cause harm to my animal or myself, then no way on earth.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I said yes because, because as a young man, I did share my in heat female with a neighbor and he shared his dog whan she was in heat. I might be willing to do it agin, but only if I knew the person very well.
a very tricky question, i wound tend to say flat out NO! ... as the newbies always ask to use your dog! ..........to me it's like having another wife....i love my dog and would only wish to share if the person was very close to me..and still i may be a little reluctant.....
I would not allow anyone to touch her, she's my love, my hun. Why would i be so careless as to offer her like a plaything?
I would only share a animal lover if (and this is very unlickely) I were to have a human partner.
If I were to have an animal partner of my own, I would have to say, only if I really like and trust the other person. Basically I'd see it as having a threesome, cept one of us is an animal!
i could,nt dicide till the time was at handi would normally say no cause it would amointto shareing my spousebut if my mate made the advance on the personthemselfs i suppose i would allow itbut only if i knew the person well enough to knowthey were clean and wold honnor my mateswellbeing and choises HB58
I'm with Honeyraptor on this subject..Maybe I would let my friend have sex with my canine girl,but it would be up to her to choose.
It has been a while but I have had the chance to share with a few friends. Now this was only because I was able to trust them and I new they would never do anything to hurt my animals.
Sam often has the energy to carry when ive had all i can take, for this reason i say "maybe".
call me selfish......but no way get your own .....unless it was with my human lover then that would be different
You're not selfish,Thowra.That's the way you feel and there's nothing wrong with that.Though I have to say that for me (zoo-exclusive) there's no "human lover" so I guess this is why I would (theoretically) let my lover have sex with my friend.
This is sort of a "loaded" question for me. It depends on which animal the other wishes to make love too. I've got mares, geldings and stallions here, but two mares are special to me. On the other hand, there is a Belgian mare that just loves being fucked, should I deny her something she loves?Have a good one
Not a chance. The love and trust that has built between my lovers and I is not worth risking. Under no circumstances would this ever happen.
The wife and myself swing every now and then to begin with. Like someone else said "it would be like a threesome, but one of us was a canine". The other person would definantly have to be trusted and of course would have to be accepted by the furry one.I also realize that there are many who would like their first time and want to "borrow" others partners... I'm kind of iffy on this. I've seen lots of people in the community be intolerant of others simply because they use the wrong terminology. I think that if, occasionally, my partner accepted it, and again, I trusted the person, it would be ok. But those would be rare rare circumstances.Yours, Icarus Extant
"Come and get it"A pen full of female calves and as many guys as I trusted......... one big weekend of a massive heifer orgy. Or, one heifer, myself, and a bunch of guys I trusted and it could be a gangbang. Maybe it's just me, but I'd have no problem sharing, and it would make one hell of an amazing video.
As for me, well it'd have to be someone that I knew well and trusted, I think.QUOTE (calfBoinker Posted on Sep 26 2004 @ 05:37 PM) "Come and get it"A pen full of female calves and as many guys as I trusted......... one big weekend of a massive heifer orgy. Or, one heifer, myself, and a bunch of guys I trusted and it could be a gangbang. Maybe it's just me, but I'd have no problem sharing, and it would make one hell of an amazing video. Well I'd love to join ya fur that Calf Boinker and hopefully make some wonderful great Grade A Videos and pix. Maybe you can teach me about Female Calf fucking passions ?THey look so Wonderful and sweeeet WHINNY
Interesting how some zoos seem to think...One minute: You must not force your decision on the animal.Next minute: I will absolutely force this decision on my animal.Might I also expend the question to areas outside of sex? What about masturbation of your pet? What about kissing? How about something as simple as playing or cuddling? Cuddling after all requires a fair amount of intimacy...Though I can understand the logic and emotions behind not sharing (and would probably agree with it if I were in that position) it still seems a little suspect. Mostly because (I feel) it highlights what many feel is is worst about zoophilia - that it is an unequal relationship.Rona.
rona thankyou for that i really liked what you said and you have your first vote from me welcome to bfokay i really do not know and have never been faced with this decision and if ever i was i think i would say no the reason i would say that is because simply because she doesnt know the person well enough if somebody wanted to have sex with my baby i think she may not mind the reason for this is because she wants to please me this will sound very selfish and evil i know i pay all of her vet bills i pay for her food i look after her i take her for walks i love her she loves me i would defend her to death as she would for me what do you do for heri dont see you taking her to the vets i dont see a massive food bill on your credit card or nothing why should she offer herself intimately to you when you do nothing for herin addition i bought her and signed an emotional pact between myself and her that i would be her defender till death i would never put her in a position where she needed to defend herself against anyone or anything simple no way i would never ask someone else to be intimate with their lovers either no matter how well i knew them it is just disrespectful and wrong imo on top of that no one kisses and cuddels my girl but me i dont think she would tolerate it from anyone else
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
CalfBoinker said...>A pen full of female calves and as many guys as I trusted......... one big >weekend of a massive heifer orgy. Or, one heifer, myself, and a bunch of guys I >trusted and it could be a gangbang. Maybe it's just me, but I'd have no problem >sharing, and it would make one hell of an amazing video.I have to go with CalfBoinker here. I love my animals, but I don't considerthem monagomous. Cows are content to be banged by any bull that comesover the hill, and they don't mind or care who is back there. Ask the animal.If she says no, you will know it, possibly in the form of a hoofprint on yourforehead. If the animal doesn't mind, I don't. The last "orgy" I was at afew years ago, there were six guys and three cows. It was wonderful,taking turns, holding tail for each other, watching each other fuck and lick. Thecows enjoyed it and got only pleasure out of it. Nothing wrong with that.
Animal gang-bangs; been to several and hosted a few myself. Always with trusted friends. Always had a great time. No animal was ever injured and all gave every indication they enjoyed it. Including female sheep, goats, horses/ponies/minis, donkeys, llamas, heifers & heifer-calves, and, once and only once, fallow deer The term 'gang-bang' makes it sound like we're callous and selfish but I've always found the male participants to be carring and sensitive to the animals response even if we're a little vigorous at times I'd jump at the chance to be at a multiple sheep or especially a multi heifer-calf gang-bang again (sigh).All the beast,heiferhammer
I tend to be of the "no, never group" with but these few exceptions:I will share my K9 mates with my human mate because she loves and respects them and cares for their welfare as much as I do. Threesomes and foursomes with one or two of our dogs are awesome.I will not share my female K9 mates with anyone but my human mate, however, on a couple of rare occasions where a trusted friend wanted to be with one of my male K9 mates and my dog wanted to do it also, I shared him, but it was of his own free will what he did and how far he went. I was there and made sure of that. On one of the occasions, my friend wanted to do more than what my dog felt comfortable doing, so I stopped it right there.This is a good thread. Makes you think. Lots of things on this forum do that.Skeezix
If i had a pigpen, id invite everyone!
I think this really depends on the kind of relationship you've got going on and what you value in it. What would decide it for me is mostly how attached my animal is to me. Some people are in it for sex first. They don't care as much if the animal is attracted to them or not, as long as it is responding to them sexually. It's not a bad thing at all. They are still a zoo and they still care for the animals but attachment isnt as important. This is me.Some people are in it for the love, and the sex is purely an expression of that love. I would like to be in a relationship like this. Human or animal, this is a beautiful thing to achieve. All of you who have something like this should be extremely proud and grateful.So would I share? Maybe. I'd have to feel very comfortable with that person and know that they not only respected my partner but respected me as well. But I wouldn't mind somebody who I knew going out and rubbing a few horse bellies in the pasture, just stay away from the red mare... She's a little "hot blooded"...
my boy is one of ths most precious things in my life and only people who I realy love and trust may have sex with him if he wants to. I trust them with my life so I can trust them with my mates. Even then he would have to take the initiative and I would be near to see that nothing bad would happen to both of them.Right now there's one person with who I would realy realy love to share my boy with but he's a real romantic so
I'm glad to see this post since I was just wondering about this. Almost all of the posts on this topic are reasuring to me as to the quality of people on this forum. It's good to know so many of you value the relationships your have with your animals, the trust they place in you, and the resposiblities that entails. I understand that alot of people online are looking for there first expiriance, and some arn't in a circumstance to be able to keep animals of there own; so I suppose it's good their are people out there willing to help, but.... In the personals section it seams like 98% of the posts say "come screw my animal" or "I want to screw your animal" - Ok, that's not really what they say but you get my point right? the posts are blunt/short, without context. It just rubs me the wrong way, cause its too easy to emagine the animal being used like an object, even if thats not what happening in most cases- and I hope it's not. It's wrong to do this to an animal... I mean, sure you can argue, he'll screw anyone or she loves to fuck, so as long as they enjoy its ok- I'm not compleatly oposed to this arugument; but just cause my dog wants to play in the street, dosn't mean I'm going to let her... Zoo or not, when you own an animal you're responsible for their wellbeing. What lion and hairbear said is crucial, Even if your a free spirited swinger who's mainly in it for lustful sex, Diesese is a risk that shouldn't be taken lightly. When breeding for pups or foals any responsible owner wants a health exam for the stud or dam/bitch, yet I rather doubt if many of the people offering up there animals or accecpting others is showing up with papers from an std cheak. And when I think about the real nutz out there, the peta stalkers, the religious freaks, serial killers... How can a zoo justify exposing themself and their animal to this, even if it is unprobable? Why can't people intrested in sharing just post 'hey I'm a active/seeking polygamous zoo, would love to get to know you' and take it from there with causion- would make us look alot better IMHO. soo anyway; sorry for ranting a bit.I wouldn't allow my animals to be with anyone unless it was with someone I really loved/trusted and knew was clean; and then only on the animals consent and initiative.
Thanks to a friendly neighbor he shared his mare and I was hooked as she was my first time... I also shared a couple times later on.. ck9 [m]
QUOTE (Troubadour @ Nov 5 2004, 09:02 PM) Some people are in it for sex first. They don't care as much if the animal is attracted to them or not, as long as it is responding to them sexually. It's not a bad thing at all. They are still a zoo and they still care for the animals but attachment isnt as important. This is me.Some people are in it for the love, and the sex is purely an expression of that love. I would like to be in a relationship like this. Human or animal, this is a beautiful thing to achieve. All of you who have something like this should be extremely proud and grateful. Well said, Troubadour. This kind of falls in where I see things. Is it immoral or degrading to have sex with a person if you don't love them with all your heart? It may be less fulfilling than having your true love, but what if there is no such perfect man/woman/critter in your life yet?That fits with what I see from the posters who say they'd never even consider sharing too. They've already found that deep intimacy, and they don't want anyone else messing with that because they've already reached a point where their lovers share that perfect bond with them.So maybe the analogy to sharing human lovers with others isn't entirely accurate. It depends on how close the two of you are. Maybe you wouldn't share your wife (or whatever), but you'd be more tolerant of with swinging with your screwing-but-not-commited-friend.But that's starting to add more variables so it's kinda leading outside of this poll.
I am an "allround" animal-lover from holland and i wish i could have made a movie of all the animals i met ( horses, ponys, cows, bulls dogs and pigs) but because i have no animal for myself i have to improvice all the time i have some movieshots of me and a ponymare and a cow with a banana eating out of their heavenly vagina's.If it's my choice I love livin on a farm in denmark with all kind of animals aroud meand loving them all day long
I would've shared my Bull Mastiff with another woman, if she wanted to have sex with him. Unfortunately the situation never presented itself. My initial experience was with a black Lab owned by my best girlfriend's roommate. They were both active with him, and they let me have aceess to him as well. Carrie
i thought about this and have decided that yes i would , if it was with friends that i already play with, i wouldnever raise the issue to them, only one other person knows of my hidden life, and she is also a part of it.as for meeting someone who wants to borrow a dog, no never
Heyah tomato cat!! Long time no see.man, I'm of a few minds on this one..first off, I run into FAR too many people who seem to think my animals are communal fork toys.. way uncool of 'em, and not the kind of person I'd share with.On the other hand, having draft stallions that like to play, I know what a rare commodity that is and in a way I feel a need to share them, so that others can enjoy the experience that such a creature can provide them. However, having had animals mistreated by folks in the past, and my so called partner having murdered my lover, it makes me very very wary. Not because of any moral issues, but because of the safety and well being of my animals.So yeah, I will still share, but only with people that I know very well and have known for at least several years. People who are allways stable, ie.. allways the same when I talk with them. Not whining or cajoling or trying to guilt me or any of that odd stuff, but folks who are even keeled and simply interested in not only my animals, but me as a person and willing to share with me things about them.It's pretty easy anymore to see who's a user and abuser and who's a real person who istn' trying to "be what they think I want them to be to get an invite".Anyways, yeah, I'd share, but only with someone I considered cool and that I trusted. And of course, I *WOULD* supervise. The list of folkjs I'll just turn loose with a critter I can count on two fingers.Take care tomo, be less of a stranger, eh? Hawse
I couldnt share my 2 female dogs with anyone. I am in a very loving, caringrelationship with them and spend all my waking and sleeping hours with them.In my opinion sharing them would be no different then someone sharing theirgirlfriend or wife with someone. I have nothing against people who would dothese things, I just would never do it myself.I also am only active with my own dogs and wouldnt want anybody elses either.To me this would be like cheating on them.Same goes with a human relationship, Im not interested in that either.My lovelife is devoted to my k-9's only and me sharing them or me loving someone or something else is out of the question.
Would I share? Nope. Why not? Why should I? Get yer own animal/s.My opinions on the subject are most aligned with those of Pitbull's Sept. 27th 2004 post.
Jezz pretty much sumed it up for me as well. No way could i ever share my lover, I am very exclusive female k9. i have a very deep very intimate relationship with my lover, as well as she with me. I know also she feels the same for me as i do for her, i'm the only one she'll be with, I will always regret this but i did offer to share one of my girls with a very close friend, and she plainly said no, not with anyone else but me, she plainly tells anyone that gets to "close" to her no, but she loves me. That is my lab girl. I am starting to see the same in my shepard girl now to. My shepard girl is my main lover, but i love all my girls so much. To share them would not be for me. That is just my opinion, one i happen to feel strongly towards, but also i respect other people's opinions, so i never force it upon others. I also wold not be with domeone else's lover/girl. Tundra
i could not imagine myself sharing eithergood points, tundra and jezzabelle
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
very tricky question. there are so many factors to have to consider.
I'm thinking similar to tundra, I'm also exclusive, and I can't imagine my lover with someone else.
no way,my 3 girls are mine would never share .
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I dont think i will ever share my partner unless my partner really wants to be with someone else but i dont really see that happening because i give my partner any thing he wants anytime he wants so he has no need for anyone else!Crash
Don't think I'd share my dog .... just can't see it happening!
I would never share Shadow my gelding with anyone else but I do have other big pets that for the right person and if the pet liked them I would share.
I don,t know because I don,t let anyone but on here know about my lifestyle, I don,t want to be blackmailed in the future so I shut my mouth.
I'll share if the animal is willing. I have helped several of my friends get into it and try zoo. So.. the way I see it... Why should I be the one to prevent one to get into zoo? If they want to try, I'm willing to help with my experiance. If my pet mounts, good for him and who ever the girl is he is mounting.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Some of us would like our love to be monogamist. But our male counter parts are not the same, it does not matter if they walk on two or four legs if there is a new female around then they let their lower appendage do all the thinking for them.
I don't have a partner right now, but I just couldn't see myself sharing one. I'd be far too concerned that the other person might not treat her right, and I don't view animals as sex toys. I wouldn't mind letting someone else pet or groom her under supervision, but that's as far as it would go.
I have shared, but it takes a long while to build enough trust. I've said to others, "If I tell your neighbors that you swing. No big deal. If you tell mine I fuck with dogs, its a huge deal."
yup. have shared mine in the past, and have shared other zoos animals. was loads of fun.
In general, no--I would not choose to "share" my animals. I won't condemn anyone who does so--provided the animal is allowed to consent--but in my personal philosophy, I support monogamy. The one possible exception I can think of would be if I were also involved with a human partner, and said partner knew of and supported my sexual orientation. If they were interested in trying anything, and if my dog(s) fully consented, I would probably make an exception. Other than that, I would not want to pass an animal of mine around like a communal bong--but stuff like head scritches would be welcome!
Nope, sorry. I don't share my boy. You'll just have to get your own.
I'd have no problem sharing my k9 partners with other women. Provided I knew them well and they were clearly interested. I let my best girlfriend be with my Lab, and she let me be with her Dalmatian. Now she and her husband were more into the swinger lifestyle, so the Dalmatian was also with 2 other women besides my friend and me. I wasn't thrilled with that, but those were just the facts of the situation. When I took over ownership of the Dalmatian for about 6 months, I remained highly active with him despite knowing about his past experiences with others. I would've shared the Dalmatian with another woman if the situation ever arose. Again though this would've been done in a very limited and selective basis.
I'm torn on this one... because of the animals I like most (horses) and not having the means to ever have one.So I'll say this is a 'share with ONE other very close friend only' trio type thing to help that friend that can't otherwise fulfill the love they feel.To be honest, I must also admit, that if I had the means I would not want to share my main mare unless I grew to love my said partner/friend, but would share another if I had two.Hope that don't make me too much of a hypocrite.
i put only if your another zoo friend, casue i know me and my wife are willing to swing witht he right people so i assuem i would with my pet. once i get one.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Ofcourse it all depends on the love and respect for that animal.And the permission of his owner.Its working basically like a normal marriage.If it become onloving , uncontroleable and without respect, it become messy and rape.But with true respect and love , from friends and partners, I think it can work and all can benefit from it.But don`t overdo the poor animal with sex.He can take only so much.Not more then 3 sex sessions per 24 hours per animal.
Not having any animals to share, I can't give a real answer to this..just a hypothetical "maybe" It would depend on several factors - How much did I love and respect ALL sides of the equation, human and animal? My interest is primarilly equine..and these days the options to have the space, and facilities to contain an equine companion in the conditions they require is not an option for many. So if I had such a facility, should I deny it to another I trust ?And I'll propose a flip side to the question. Everyone here is assuming the question refers to sharing your animal lover/companion with another HUMAN. What if it's the other way around..would you allow your animal companion the choice of their OWN companion ?
i would share with friends i knowbecause i dont see my animals as like my exclusive lover, yes i love them as my family but not like romantically at allso to me its just like a friend having sex with a friendhowever i wouldnt like just let anyone do it
I would never share my mare with anyone unless they were willing to put the same amount of time into gaining her trust that I have. If I tied her up and let someone she didn't know have their way with her she'd never forgive me.
I answered "Maybe, maybe not" mainly because I don't have an animal and so haven't reall evern been in a situation where this might be something to consider. As long as the animal is willing and isn't harmed I don't really see the moral problem about this. But only if the animal truly wants to do this too. Also, I would deeply respect any zoo who chooses not to share their animal.
I don't have any pets yet, and I know no zoos living near me. But I guess I would share my pet with another zoo (in the future when I met the two requires above) if that zoo is: male. know me for at least half a year. also a . and other requirements...
QUOTE (lion_x98 @ Jun 17 2004, 09:50 AM) i would have to say no. though it is morally wrong to me it may not be to others (ie zoophillia) on a second note there are a whole lotta diseases that can be spread by doing this. did you know that they say the aids virus can survive in a bitches vagina for upto 24 hours or is it 48? i cant remember for sure. I thought it more like 10 days but any how I voted maybe maybe not in this poll the more accurate answer is, maybe, more likely not. There is always change to situations, though if any one did just happen to ask me if they could have my girl just for one night or even a few minutes I'd say no ... I'm not really big on the idea of sharing my animal lovers, and can you really trust anyone with your animal, trust is a very delicate thing.
I put maybe, maybe not, he is a pet first and foremost, I never say never but would have to completely trust the person before even considering them meeting my boy
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
NEVAH, and I would never accept an invitation to have sex with someone elses either, I do not have the Emotional attachment nor do they.
No. I will never offer to share my mates or accept offers to share anyone else's. I have lots of time and love invested in my relationships and want to keep them private.LTD
So far, the only person I have shared an animal lover with was my spouse, and honestly, while she allows such play on occasion, she doesn't really "get into it". It's more that she knows it turns me on, I am sure.My canine lovers have been as close to me as my Human lover is, so in general, I don't think I would share him with anyone else, unless I developed a very special relationship with that other person. And that is unlikely, as I am monogamous among Humans!Not sure that I would accept if another zoo offered me access to their canine lover. Maybe. It would, again, require a fairly close connection with the dog's owner, and a high degree of trust established.
NEVER EVER EVER...........EVER not in a mean way but MY lover is my lover she is my everything and i couldnt risk her well being nor would i except an invite not even from the dog itself now could any of you live with yourself knowing that you lent your dog your lover out like she or he was a rent-a-toy or somthing and when you got her back and she had a deadly std or somthing and only had about a year to live that would be like stealing her life away and exchanging it with a short term life and saying enjoy it while it last i know i certainly couldnt.but alass we come to the root of our problem its not really our choice to make is it it is more theres that is if you believe in animal rights but who am i to tell you what to do
The other day I posted this under another thread but it is very relevant in this one:Quote: There is no way I would willingly allow other men to have their way with either my girlfriend or my dog because I have the same high regard and love for them both. By the same token I want to be faithfull to both my girlfriend and my dog as lovers because it would be extremely selfish and unfair not to do so!That is my stance on the question of sharing!Pokerman
I think i could do that in some circumstances, but not frequently.
no, never, it would be too ackward
I don't think I could, sorry. It's one thing to loan a friend your favorite shirt or let them borrow your car...but passing around your four-legged lover? I'll pass.
i would share but trust would have to be established first
Last modified on July 5th, 2009 | Zoodestiny.com | © 2003-2005 - All Rights Reserved