A word from our sponsors...
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Do you think that human vagina and dog;s penis are more compatibile than human vagina and human penis? many women say that thay can not achive orgasam throu penetrative sex with men but, thanks to knot ,thay can do it with dogs?
It's a conspiracy!!!!!! Our ancestor's have planned it all along!!!
hmm makes you wonder, but I have a feeling it will be more common with dogs and women. I know about 30r so women who I suspect. I have a theory it might be to bring down the birth rate. Oh well it's a theory. Women can have sex and not get preg!!
opps i meant to type 3 or so women not 30
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I'm not sure if it's better, but it's certainly an interesting idea
QUOTE (tarko3 @ Mar 26 2004, 06:20 AM)Do you think that human vagina and dog;s penis are more compatibile than human vagina and human penis? many women say that thay can not achive orgasam throu penetrative sex with men but, thanks to knot ,thay can do it with dogs?I dont know because I have not had the pleasure yet...... but I suspect that if and when I do it will be out of much shared love and affection with the dog .... so much so that it would lead into that or be an extention of a loving moment with the dog..... Once I am there I have no doubt that the taboo aspects of the act will kick in and make me out of my mind f*cking hot!!!! Thru out the whole act it will be very hot and I will be very turned on but do I think I will orgasm from the experience? No. I say no because I really need to have that hard grinding pounding motion of a mans pubic bone hitting my clit be it with me on top grinding to my little hearts content or be it anally, me on all fours with his hand wrapped around and under me clutching at my crotch.... mashing his fingers....jiggling my clit.... lol ....you get the picture!!! On the other hand taking a dog missionary style and letting him knot in me..... I could see where that knot swelling against my G-Spot might just be somewhere between heaven and earth!!!! I'm just not sure what kind of dog would fit comfortably that way.... uggggh still learning all this stuff
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Wendy,Just get a really big dog.Bigger the dog, the heavier the pounding and force he will give you, bigger the dick, knot, balls, load, and all. The bigger the dog the better they are. The biggest for me was my sisters' Great Pyrenean Mountain Dog. He was big and heavy, and let me tell you, when he thrusted and pounded you knew it and felt it. He's the one that stratched me open years ago. That a the nieghbors' huge azz Yellow Lab. Both of the dogs were over 100 lbs.
It not only feels so much better but I know my sam loves with without question. I have had too many guys just use me to masterbate into.
This is mostly what I have heard, but from what I have read so far, it seems that everyone is failry correct. When having sex with male dogs, the knot will be agains the G-spot in women and in guys it should be against the prostate which also gives good and high pleasure. I find in the limited experience that I have with dogs is that they would fill one up more than a human male. Really stretch one's insides in way that a human male can't. The same would apply for stallion as they flare up and also cum pretty hard, so suspect that would really be felt hard Added to that you also have the fur part of it as well heheSo in conclusion I'd have to say that they shold be getting more sex with dogs, and as it's not something one talks fully about openly, the real number of women (and men) that have sex with dogs are more than what is known.I think that being zoo and being able to reach higher levels of pleasure with sex with animals, such as dogs etc, due to their anatomy could be a way to limit the population of our species.
While not female, I have talked to zoo friends who are. All agree the experience is way different and very good (once personal issues, fears, anxiety and difficulty in getting the dog and getting him up and staying without pulling out.)For the guys who fear that "If she has a dog she won't need me...", look to the quality of the rest of relationship. The dog can be a plus, or a wakeup call.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I agree with Lugarou here. For many of us, there is more to a relationship than lovemaking. I know a few here that think they dont need human companionship. And that makes me wonder what they are doing in here. The beings in here writing posts, posting pics etc. are humans, not dogs or horses, so SOME human contact must be needed, right?For me a dog could never replace the relationship with my man, because he gives me so much a dog cant. Kids (*S*), companionship, great conversations, comforting and help if I am troubled, support me thru difficult times, share happy occasions with me, makes me laugh, stimulates my intellect and a zillion other things I wont bore you with here*grins*As for the sexual part....there is a multitude of stuff a man can do, that a dog cant. And I am not only talking about the physical part of sex here, I am referring to the mental part of lovemaking...the stuff that takes place before one gets down to the "serious" business*lol* The subtil hints, the looks one give eachother, the fanazies one share, the apparently non-sexual touches...In a human/human relationship making love to eachothers "brains" (I hope you see what I mean) is unique, and for me a "must". Dont get me wrong, I love my boy dearly, but I would never survive in a monogamic relationship with a dog. My two cents, LadyR
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 28 2004, 10:44 AM) I agree with Lugarou here. For many of us, there is more to a relationship than lovemaking. I know a few here that think they dont need human companionship. And that makes me wonder what they are doing in here. The beings in here writing posts, posting pics etc. are humans, not dogs or horses, so SOME human contact must be needed, right?For me a dog could never replace the relationship with my man, because he gives me so much a dog cant. Kids (*S*), companionship, great conversations, comforting and help if I am troubled, support me thru difficult times, share happy occasions with me, makes me laugh (often!!*S*) stimulates my intellect and a zillion other things I wont bore you with here*grins*As for the sexual part....there is a multitude of stuff a man can do, that a dog cant. And I am not only talking about the physical part of sex here, I am referring to the mental part of lovemaking...the stuff that takes place before one gets down to the "serious" business*lol* The subtil hints, the looks one give eachother, the fanazies one share, the apparently non-sexual touches...In a human/human relationship making love to eachothers "brains" (I hope you see what I mean) is unique, and for me a "must". (there is at least one person who knows what I am saying here and fully agrees, right honey?*grins*)Dont get me wrong, I love my boy dearly, but I would never survive in a monogamic relationship with a dog. My two cents, LadyR Very well formulated; clear and meticulous. Obviously a well educated woman, with well developed emotions, who recognizes the value human relationships can have. I agree completely: making love to your dog is sex, can even be love, but the emotional contact will always be less than between a man and a woman who are crazy about eachother and are really spiritually bonded.Why is it that it is always Rottweilers that have these clear visions? I want to write something intelligent to, once in a while Ah, well: that's ok; at least we are cuter.I think.(I hope)
Wow. Very nice post, LadyR. I think many people need to hear that kind of statement.
Strange. I am a man yet i like hearing from women who say that sex with a dog can be more sexually arousing and better than with a man. I think u do need a man just to remind you how naughty it is. Which after all can make it more arousing if shared witha man !!! hmmm hmmm
You can't really compare men and male dogs in the same way. A dog doesn't make love, he just humps away. Instinct rules his world. Sure once a male dog realizes it's possible to mate with a human female, he'll want it and even initiate it. But again it's just a purely physical act on his part. Is the sex better? I'd say no. Lets just say that having experienced K9, most women would want to do it again.Karen
maybe in some aspects it is more fit because let's face it not every guy has a large cock. but dogs can compensate for that by the knot. and, with the right type of the dog, the cock is usually a lot longer.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Yeah, I mean, women aren't emotionally deprived sex addicted machines that own dogs for mere animal pleasure
but there dicks look funny
oh and they cant kiss you very good
Hmmmmm well your right it is very diffrent but ill tell you its alot more exciting and drives me crazy when im getting it from my Lab. i can ride him he can doggie me even missionary style me...i know he loves me and hes never hurt me at first i was afraid of his size and thickness but omg i so crave him nowhe can have me anytime he wants when my husband isnt home (((hugs))) and Kisses Fantasy
I don't think a man's penis can compare to a dogs... The dog has a knot & men don't... However we can control the the style of sex ( slow, fast, hard, soft, etc. ) we can also do all kinds of interesting positions which dogs can't do. So I guess it just depends on what the woman wants. As far as the tongue goes, I would be willing to bet that a man can lick a woman just as good as any dog. The only difference, is a dogs tongue is rougher. However men again have style & we will lick longer as well. *** Allright, so I LOVE CUNNILINGUS.... Sue me! LOL ***
Lady R. you are a woman after my heart. I believe stimulation is the clear fact here whether it be animal or human. It just depends on what one wants or needs at that time. Correct me if I am wrong.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
This has crossed my mind many a time. What if the man could knot like a dog??Myself, I am sure I have had many orgasms with a dog than a man. I'm sure it hsa something to do with knotting with the dog.Yes, in reading other comments, I do agree, a man gives you many things a dog can't, but when that dog shoves his cock in there, knots, and lets go, WOW!!!!!
Fantasy and animallust----the only thing wrong with your posts is that there are not hundreds more!!!!! Keep posting. Thanks!!!!! K9Dom
I haven't experienced it either yet, but I do know that at this time in my life that dogs get me way hotter than men or women do. not that they dont turn me on, they do, its just that thinking about dogs is a lot....naughtier
i agree doggy cock goes so well with human pussy its so sexy to se happen
The problem most men have, when it comes to women, is their almost total ignorance of the female body. Most guys know--mouth, tits, ass, pussy----and that's about it. They have no idea of the " wiring circuits " that connects them all together. I know because I've been there, done that, felt that, too. It's called, " letting the little head do the thinking for the big head" . When I hit puberty, one of my main goals in life was to learn everything I possibly could about girls' bodies and never stopped learning. My main problem was I didn't put it into practice. I let " the little head do the........." But then, several years ago, I met a fantastic lady in Oklahoma that slowed me down and showed me EXACTLY what I'd been missing. After some quiet kissing, cuddling, stroking, etc., she became so sensitive , I could cause her to orgasm, then take her right back to " the top of the mountain " just by carressing her breast. During one lovemaking night, she got so dialed in that she " came " when I lightly bit down on the end of her middle finger. A very large part of MY enjoyment is giving my lady HER enjoyment. Often, I would get so involved in playing her body like a fine violin, that my cock would go soft. But, it didn't take long for it to jump back, when attention shifted. That lady had been married 3 times and had 5 kids and not a damded one of her ex-husbands ever bothered to learn about HER. Now, would a male animal ever take the place of a male human?? Not if that human male takes the time necessary to learn his wife's or girlfriend's needs and circuitry. Generally speaking, women have many more ways to be pleasured than most men would believe; and guys, the learning curve can be very pleasing for both of you. THEN, you can bring in your beloved dog, pony, horse, pig, or whoever, to ADD TO your enjoyment---not replace. THEN EVERYBODY WINS!!!!!! Sorry to be so long-winded, but that's the way I feel. Not trying to p*** off anybody. When I think of all the missed opportunities back in my selfish days, I can just #*&$@#* and then, *&[EMAIL REMOVED - USE THE PRIVATE MESSAGE SYSTEM];^. myself.
Well you know...its not only the men's fault...A woman needs to tell her partner what she wants, what feels good and what doesnt...If not, how is he supposed to know how to please her? Men and women are built differently physycally and mentally, and being a good lover isnt something one is born with. The biggest problem is that many think that what is shown in porno movies is the "real world". And thats as far from the truth as possible LadyR
You are absolutely right , Lady R. Porno movies have reached the point where all of the women dress like hookers and the guys are pretty-boys. A lot of men think they're communicating with their ladies if she says," Yes." when he asks her " was it good for you?" I learned more from my ladies actions and reactions than from their words because some of THEM didn't really know what they liked. It sure was fun helping them learn. One of the most fasinating discoveries I ever made was finding out that if a woman is normally ticklish, she stops being that way after she 'turns-on' and those nerves seem to become directly connected to the area of the G-spot. I don't mean to be sounding like a smart-aleck, know-it-all. It's just that I've been down a lot of roads and trails in my life and I've never found a more interesting and fascinating creature than " Woman ".
Extremely well described, Tightfit. You are absolutely correct, the biggest pleasure comes from giving your partner his/hers best experience. It multiplies the strength of everything you do together.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
As if there were only one thing that got a woman off.This is like the "once you go black, you never go back" myth -- I've had a few white girlfriends "go black" and happily "go back." This isn't intended to be racist; black men certainly aren't inherently any worse lovers than white men, but the point is that they're not inherently any better lovers, either.The problem is, you're just not going to convince anybody. The men (and women) who are convinced that dogs are better lovers for human women than human men are going to remain convinced regardless of what anyone says, and vice versa.Nobody ever likes the truth, which is that things are complicated. Human sex, like it or lump it, takes place more in the brain than in the vagina or penis. Don't believe me? Consider having sex with a very ugly person. That hideous man's penis may be just as large and well formed as the handsome man's, and the hag's vagina may be just as snug and wet, but probably what will happen is that you'll lose your erection or be unable to get wet. But if it was all just a physical reaction, like some kind of mathematical equation -- put penis in vagina, rub g-spot, orgasm! -- then it wouldn't matter if we were attracted to our lovers, right? But it does matter. And, it matters if we love them, too -- we've probably all had the experience of an attractive person seeming less and less attractive as we got to know them and like them less, or vice-versa-- as we grow to know and love our mate, they seem sexier and sexier (ideally).My point is, sex is in the head far more than in the genitals, so there's no magic formula for pleasure and orgasms. The path to pleasure is as unique and idiosyncratic as people are. In fact, being so goal-oriented (orgasm-driven) is a big turn-off for some women (and even, although you may not believe me, for some men -- me being one!) What is endlessly sexy for one woman (say dog-sex) is disgusting and disturbing to another woman (ie, my ex-girlfriend). The sexiness and orgasm potential doesn't lie in the thing itself (dogs, white men, black men, lesbians), but in the mind of the person experiencing it.Until we accept that sex takes place far more in our heads than in our genitals (or any other body part), we're doomed to repeat our mistakes and be frustrated and disappointed that our encounters aren't what we'd hoped they could be. The "knot" doesn't cause orgasm. Your desire for, and receptiveness to, the "knot" is what causes the orgasm.Sex is in the brain folks. Make love to a woman's (or man's) MIND and not just her BODY... Learn that and you can put Casanova to shame with your reputation as a lover.
How about the other side of the equation? Which one is better: woman or dog vulva? Rona
I think that the man and the dog are not comparable and this would be an error to think it, each has its advantages. the couple man woman is the basis of social life, I not some would add. But the dog has important sexual advantages on the man, its physical particularitées, his tongue, his sex, his sperme and the possibility that it has to understand and to learn quickly the woman some do a wonderful lovers able to give more of orgasmes in a linking than no man cannot do it, in a couple it can be a very appreciated complement.
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 28 2004, 04:44 AM) I agree with Lugarou here. For many of us, there is more to a relationship than lovemaking. I know a few here that think they dont need human companionship. And that makes me wonder what they are doing in here. The beings in here writing posts, posting pics etc. are humans, not dogs or horses, so SOME human contact must be needed, right?For me a dog could never replace the relationship with my man, because he gives me so much a dog cant. Kids (*S*), companionship, great conversations, comforting and help if I am troubled, support me thru difficult times, share happy occasions with me, makes me laugh, stimulates my intellect and a zillion other things I wont bore you with here*grins*As for the sexual part....there is a multitude of stuff a man can do, that a dog cant. And I am not only talking about the physical part of sex here, I am referring to the mental part of lovemaking...the stuff that takes place before one gets down to the "serious" business*lol* The subtil hints, the looks one give eachother, the fanazies one share, the apparently non-sexual touches...In a human/human relationship making love to eachothers "brains" (I hope you see what I mean) is unique, and for me a "must". Dont get me wrong, I love my boy dearly, but I would never survive in a monogamic relationship with a dog. My two cents, LadyR Couldn't have said it better. Lady R you are a first class Lady !!!
I agree completely with lady R
The original question, I think, was which penis is better to woman, dogs or mens.The question clearly came from a man. To me, and I think, most women I know, what makes for "good sex" is far more than a penis. It's about feelings; do I feel safe...safe enough to express myself...safe that what we share in private will stay in private...safe that my partner will not try to dominate me when I do not want to be dominated...or will dominate me when I feel the need to a more responsive side of "the equation". Safe is a big thing. Love is also a big, if not the biggest thing - do if feel loved...will my partner respect me when I am strong...protect me when I am weak....love me no matter how I express or fail to express myself. Does my partner really understand and appreciate me?Those two feelings have a lot to do with a girl's ability to just trust and let go. And it is there, in trust and freedom that the best sex grows. That is not about the size, shape or temperature of a penis. I agree with LR that men have most of the advantages in the communications skills and in the range and artistry with which they can express themselves. I also agree with LR that the human factors are tremendous, even for those who are life long devotees to K-9 sex. To truly know you can trust someone requires that the one you will trust has the ability to break that trust. One can trust that a dog will "never tell" because a dog can't tell. A human, on the other hand, can tell, can ridicule, can punish. That is why sharing intimacy with a human involves a much deeper trust. And the depth of that trust carries the depth of the relationship.Sex with dogs can carry a different kind of trust, a more reliable and less dangerous kind of trust in many ways...but, in the end, that means the depth of the relationship...between he/she and the dog...is less deep...less strong. Some girls may argue that the most intense orgasms come from the most intense relationships. I agree and disagree here. I have had human male and female lovers with whom I have enjoyed (and endured) deep and powerful relationships. In both cases the sex was beyond "good". But there have been other times when I just need a complete kind of freedom. Free from any worry of the harm other humans can cause the heart and spirit. When I feel those modes, the sex I get from dogs can not be matched by humans.It is not about the penis. It is about the spirit...about where the mind is at the time...about where the heart is at the time. Can I exist happily without human relationships...no. Can I exist happily without at least occassional K-9 sex...no. There is my two cents.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
The topic obviously refers mainly to just the raw sex part of the pleasure... not mentally. I would say women who have only been with smaller men and has never felt satisfied by being "full" than a large dog would feel better. Likewise, a medium to large sized human dick 6"-9" offers more pleasure than any dog dick or knot.
I agree with Joe Horny.
Dogs fit nicely, are intent on making sure that when they cum - it stays in, and they stay to clean up with fantastic tongue, bringing additional orgasms. Most will return for seconds after we take a short nap together. For me, the third time he takes me is the most enjoyable.Have never had anyone watching complain - unless he forms his knot too soon and I can't get him all the way in, even with helpers.Better than guys? Different for sure - and the right guy who knows how to play is an equal --- if only guys could tie:-)
QUOTE (LadyRottweiler @ Mar 28 2004, 10:44 AM) I agree with Lugarou here. For many of us, there is more to a relationship than lovemaking. I know a few here that think they dont need human companionship. And that makes me wonder what they are doing in here. The beings in here writing posts, posting pics etc. are humans, not dogs or horses, so SOME human contact must be needed, right?For me a dog could never replace the relationship with my man, because he gives me so much a dog cant. Kids (*S*), companionship, great conversations, comforting and help if I am troubled, support me thru difficult times, share happy occasions with me, makes me laugh, stimulates my intellect and a zillion other things I wont bore you with here*grins*As for the sexual part....there is a multitude of stuff a man can do, that a dog cant. And I am not only talking about the physical part of sex here, I am referring to the mental part of lovemaking...the stuff that takes place before one gets down to the "serious" business*lol* The subtil hints, the looks one give eachother, the fanazies one share, the apparently non-sexual touches...In a human/human relationship making love to eachothers "brains" (I hope you see what I mean) is unique, and for me a "must". Dont get me wrong, I love my boy dearly, but I would never survive in a monogamic relationship with a dog. My two cents, LadyR Awsome LadyRottwieller. I think you nailed it here. I hope your husband knows how you feel. And I also I hope he knows how lucky he is.
A large part of the arousal is the taboo aspect. Helps with orgasms... particularly when it comes to multiple orgasms.
I just wish genetic manipulation would hurry the heck up. Honestly that is one part of me I have wanted to change since I was a tween. Being a furry as a child I wanted everything to be more wolf. As I became more sexual I wanted the wolf knot and shaft for my own. Do not get me wrong, I am pretty well built. Sorry everyone, but that would be HeartsofPaw's choice if she wanted to show myself, not my own. But I still most of all wanted the canine Knot. *sighs* Oneday, oneday... we can always dream... can't we...?
The orginal question and as noted it's about what feels good.. women need men to pay more attention to their biggest sex organ (the brain!) and perhaps vice versa.. if a woman of mine was banging the dog I'd want to know... it would stimulate my brain like silly and I think most men will not view it as anything but sexual excitement...
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
The issue is often we tend to focus on the physical part of sex but not with the other things fondling,cuddling,kissing, etc that comes with it. (We really need more sex education). Saying that dogs and human cocks are the same is like saying that the trolley is the same as the bus. No its not. There are many differences here.
Yes a dog can please a woman in ways a man can only dream about, but a dog can not take you out to dinner or the two of you go to the cinema and fondle each other in the back row. But a man climbs on top of you and bounces up and down for few seconds and uses you as a receptacle for his sperm, then he rolls over and goes to sleep or lays there beside you telling you how good he was, and you have to clean up his mess! At least a dog will clean his sex organ and your groin after sex.
QUOTE (st benard @ Jun 7 2007, 03:58 PM)Yes a dog can please a woman in ways a man can only dream about, but a dog can not take you out to dinner or the two of you go to the cinema and fondle each other in the back row. But a man climbs on top of you and bounces up and down for few seconds and uses you as a receptacle for his sperm, then he rolls over and goes to sleep or lays there beside you telling you how good he was, and you have to clean up his mess! At least a dog will clean his sex organ and your groin after sex.Not all men are like that. Mine thinks of my pleasure first, cleans up his mess (if he makes one) always gives me towels or tissues, and if there's a wet spot- He offers to sleep in it.I HeartsofPawsToo!
*Hugs Hearts* I love you to sweet heart! I can not deny there are a lot of guys out there that needs to learn how to treat their lover. No matter they are female or male. (Talking to you Guys not the Ladies. 80% of all Ladies know how to give you fun! )Raised with my 4 sisters, I learned a lot from reading their diaries. Also having a father tell me a simple fact and truth that will always make your love happy. *clears throat* "Make sure they are please and wanting, you shall always be happy. Second there is more than one tool to pleasure your love, do not think it is one sided."
LadyR said it completely. But there was a time when I was almost mounted by my friend's dog. I felt so aroused, It felt like I could orgasm. I don't think I could have but maybe close.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I have had my dog longer than I have kept a boyfriend Sorry boys, but I think dogs appreciate it more, and that's rewarding. After a mating and a tie, my dog doesn't just flop down and sleep, he kisses very gently and curls up and cuddles... better said than many men who roll over without so much as a goodnight Now the sex itself... a dog's tongue and a dog's knot are things a man will never compare to, it's a simply amazing feeling.
QUOTE (PIE8ER @ Apr 19 2004, 12:30 AM) As far as the tongue goes, I would be willing to bet that a man can lick a woman just as good as any dog. The only difference, is a dogs tongue is rougher. However men again have style & we will lick longer as well. Dogs tongues can be quite long and limber, which may give them an example. But humans can suck, I've found that some women prefer light sucking to licking.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
Dogs and Humans both have their bonuses. Most dogs I have seen do not last very long. Yes they can go several times, but the length of time is very short. This is not taking in consideration the foreplay.I will not deny a dogs tongue is far better than myself. But as be said, we also can supply gentle kisses and sucking abilities to the pleasure being given. As well hands to do other things to you at the same time. From messaging your legs, waist, arms, inner thighs, you get the point I hope. Now as to the males out there that are weak links to our genes, I wish to give you a sincere apology for their lack of discipline and training. I have been guilty after a very long day at work of being weak. But it is not by choice, and I do offer other things to make up for my weak moments. But normally I am a pleasant husband that will do all that I can for my love. I hope that she knows that to the bottem of my heart. But as for it being a gift and pleasant reward, it can be for us always as much as our canine companions. Sadly some of the young pups out there do need proper training. So in the future I wish you all Good Luck and Best Wishes.
It is an interesting question that has been posed and at the end of the day it is about size and technique mainly. Both dogs and humans can be unique in their own way but when when it counts it is up to the individual to decide what is most preferable. For males a dog can bring great satisfaction by massaging the prostate gland while having sex.
The best for me so far!
I don't necessarily believe that a dog's cock is more compatible to a human's vagina. It may be more pleasurable under certain circumstances. But after all human's have evolved together, mating being a key movement in the overall change. If you are one to believe in evolution, and you study the history of sex, or evolution of sex, you will see that over time both the male and female anatomy have changed to correspond and react to one another. Which is why I believe two humans are more compatible sexually. Albeit I do advocate beastality, the format of sex between humans and dogs is much more limited in comparison with humans.
Please help keep this site free by visiting our site sponsors - click on the banned below and have a look at their sites.
I suspect (from the ladies i've experienced) that the reason they can achieve an orgasm with a dog and not a person is because it's taboo. In other words, the act itself is so intense, forbidden, arousing, affectionate (it's their pet of course), that an orgasm is achieved bc of the entire process, not just bc of the penetration. just my 2cents.
QUOTE (be322 @ Jun 7 2007, 11:10 PM) QUOTE (PIE8ER @ Apr 19 2004, 12:30 AM) As far as the tongue goes, I would be willing to bet that a man can lick a woman just as good as any dog. The only difference, is a dogs tongue is rougher. However men again have style & we will lick longer as well. Dogs tongues can be quite long and limber, which may give them an example. But humans can suck, I've found that some women prefer light sucking to licking. Confirmed.
QUOTE (chasingthedragon @ Jan 26 2009, 12:40 PM) I suspect (from the ladies i've experienced) that the reason they can achieve an orgasm with a dog and not a person is because it's taboo. In other words, the act itself is so intense, forbidden, arousing, affectionate (it's their pet of course), that an orgasm is achieved bc of the entire process, not just bc of the penetration. just my 2cents. Sexual intercourse for women is much more physiological than men. It's really true that more than 75% of sex is in the woman's mind versus what's in her vagina. If a woman thinks that a certain sex session is going to be great, her mind will give her the advantage of thinking that it's some of the best sex she's ever had, therefore will actually HAVE the best sex she's ever had. Whereas if she's closed off, then she won't orgasm or enjoy the experience.The thing about beginners in beastiality, however, is that they are doing something completely unknown, forbidden, and probably something they perceive as "dangerous." They get the same type of rush comparable to having sex in public, or in a co-worker's office, or doing some sort of sexual act that is generally frowned upon. As people go further in to it, they can either still have the same feeling, or they can genuinely develop a love-trust relationship, which also in my experience provides the exact same feeling.However, physically dogs are and are not built for women. They are because of the knot: it swells while inside the vaginal canal causing the vaginal opening to be not only plugged but due to it swelling up beyond the size of the opening in the pelvis, ensures that there will be full insemination by the penis staying in as long as possible until that knot goes down. This was mainly for the whole "omg I have to spread my seed or my lineage will stop with me" thing in nature, but due to women having a very sensitive cluster of nerves behind the wall of the pelvis where the knot hits (and for most of the nerves in the vagina being in the first 1/3 closest to the opening) it provides them with INCREDIBLE pleasure that humans can only dream about giving.So what am I getting at here? It's all in the eye of the beholder. You can love your dog and have a real relationship with him (very good), or you can simply use your dog as a sex object (very bad). Either way, it's up to the woman to perceive how well her canine will pleasure her, thus truly seeing if it is more perfect for her than a human male or not.
QUOTE (atomx @ Dec 26 2004, 02:25 AM) This is like the "once you go black, you never go back" myth itz not a myth......
Sorry to join in late. Tightfit and LadyR are right. A dog can be best if a man only wants sex and not the time consuming love making. You have two different type of sexes and both are great. But for man to do his part he has to slow down and see what is going on to do it right. I used to have a gal that I could get to orgasm just by touching lightly but took time. Entering her with my penis rather than the jab & stab and get the job done produced more for bothof us and when she orgasmed and milked my sperm from me was heaven to both
Last modified on July 5th, 2009 | Zoodestiny.com | © 2003-2005 - All Rights Reserved